POLISCOPE
Back to feed
S4386FEDERALin_committee

The ADVICE Act: Improving Apprenticeship Data

Original title: ADVICE Act

April 27, 2026

Track this bill to get notified when it advances a stage. One tap to stop, anytime.

Where This Stands

Introduced
Committee
Floor Vote
Passed
Signed

Currently in_committee. The next step in the legislative lifecycle is Floor Vote.

Last action
Read twice and referred to the Committee on Health, Education, Labor, and Pensions.Apr 27, 2026

Version history

Only one version on file - nothing to compare yet. As later stages (committee substitute, engrossed, enrolled) are captured, the redline appears here.

View official text →

The Frame

What this does

This bill would create a 16-member advisory committee to recommend how the federal government can streamline data reporting for apprenticeship programs, potentially reducing administrative burdens for program sponsors and changing how workforce and education data is tracked across state and federal systems.

Who is mentioned in the record

Potentially affected actors named in the source documents. Mention is not a position.

Apprenticeship Program Sponsors

The committee is tasked with recommending ways to lower their reporting burdens and data collection requirements.

State Workforce Agencies

These agencies would be represented on the committee and would be the primary targets for data integration and standardization recommendations.

Apprentices

The committee will recommend ways to increase their access to their own learning and employment records and improve the tracking of their long-term career outcomes.

What changed

Current stage: in_committee.

What's next

Floor Vote.

Summary

The ADVICE Act proposes creating a new federal advisory committee within the Department of Labor to standardize how apprenticeship data is collected and shared. The committee would be tasked with finding ways to integrate apprenticeship records with other government systems, such as education, unemployment, and social services, to improve reporting efficiency and track long-term employment outcomes.

Key Facts

  • Establishes an apprenticeship advisory committee within the Department of Labor.
  • The committee will consist of 16 members appointed by the Secretary of Labor, representing state workforce agencies, data systems, apprenticeship sponsors, labor organizations, industry, and higher education.
  • The committee is required to submit a report with recommendations to the Secretary of Labor and Congress within 2 years of enactment.
  • The committee is tasked with recommending ways to integrate apprenticeship data with 12 specific federal and state systems, including unemployment insurance, Medicaid, and SNAP.
  • The committee must recommend ways to lower the administrative burden on apprenticeship sponsors, including reducing software requirements and human hours spent on data collection.
  • The committee must develop recommendations for tracking outcomes-based data, such as apprentice retention rates and pay statistics during and after programs.
  • The committee is tasked with recommending how to better track outcomes for non-registered paid training programs.
  • The committee must recommend ways to increase individual access to personal learning and employment records.
  • Committee members will serve for the life of the committee and are eligible for travel expenses and per diem.
  • Federal employees may be detailed to the committee without loss of civil service status.
  • The committee will terminate the day after the final report is submitted.

Frequently Asked Questions

What is the goal of the ADVICE Act?
The goal is to create an advisory committee to recommend ways to standardize and integrate apprenticeship data across various state and federal systems to improve efficiency and tracking.
Who will serve on this committee?
The committee will have 16 members appointed by the Secretary of Labor, including representatives from state workforce agencies, data privacy experts, apprenticeship sponsors, labor organizations, industry leaders, and higher education institutions.
Will this bill change how my apprenticeship data is reported?
The bill itself does not change reporting requirements; it mandates that a committee study the issue and provide recommendations to Congress and the Department of Labor within two years.

Why It Matters

This bill would create a 16-member advisory committee to recommend how the federal government can streamline data reporting for apprenticeship programs, potentially reducing administrative burdens for program sponsors and changing how workforce and education data is tracked across state and federal systems.

News Coverage

No news coverage found yet. Articles are indexed twice daily.

Lobbying Activity

Protect Democracy United (formerly known as UNITED TO PROTECT DEMOCRACY)

$70,000

2026

GOVERNMENT ISSUES

In support of the No Political Enemies Act to prevent executive punishing of individuals or organizations for constitutionally protected speech, belies, viewpoints, or political participation. In support of amending DHS appropriation riders to improve oversight and accountability on Department of Homeland security surveillance. In opposition to the SAVE America Act and requiring unnecessary barriers to voting. In support of increasing federal election security funding and identifying risks to election security and confidence posed by executive orders. In support of encouraging congressional members to uphold their legal duty to seat future lawfully elected members of Congress from the midterm elections. In support of reforms that strengthening the independence of the Judge Advocate General Corps through reforms of notification to Congress on before their termination. In support of reforms to protect independent legal advice within DoD and protect the non-political nature of the armed forces. In support of reforming the national emergencies framework to prevent executive abuses. Advocating in support of reforms that would prevent the executive branch from harming First Amendment rights of broadcasters.

Protect Democracy United (formerly known as UNITED TO PROTECT DEMOCRACY)

$70,000

2026

GOVERNMENT ISSUES

In support of the No Political Enemies Act to prevent executive punishing of individuals or organizations for constitutionally protected speech, belies, viewpoints, or political participation. In support of amending DHS appropriation riders to improve oversight and accountability on Department of Homeland security surveillance. In opposition to the SAVE America Act and requiring unnecessary barriers to voting. In support of increasing federal election security funding and identifying risks to election security and confidence posed by executive orders. In support of encouraging congressional members to uphold their legal duty to seat future lawfully elected members of Congress from the midterm elections. In support of reforms that strengthening the independence of the Judge Advocate General Corps through reforms of notification to Congress on before their termination. In support of reforms to protect independent legal advice within DoD and protect the non-political nature of the armed forces. In support of reforming the national emergencies framework to prevent executive abuses. Advocating in support of reforms that would prevent the executive branch from harming First Amendment rights of broadcasters.

MEHLMAN CONSULTING, INC.

on behalf of NORTHERN TRUST

ROBERTSON, MONAGLE, & EASTAUGH LLC (FKA ROBERTSON, MONAGLE & EASTAUGH PC)

on behalf of SPORTFISHING ASSOCIATION OF CALIFORNIA

Sponsors

Discoveries

Patterns POLISCOPE noticed across the record. These are observations to investigate, not conclusions.

policy shift90% confidence

Focus on Data Integration

The bill reflects a significant policy interest in linking apprenticeship data with social safety net programs like SNAP and Medicaid, suggesting a move toward holistic workforce tracking.

Connected Entities

personTommy TubervilleU.S. Senator who co-sponsored the bill.Map →
personBill CassidyU.S. Senator who introduced the bill.Map →
organizationDepartment of LaborThe agency where the proposed advisory committee would be housed.Map →

Analysis Score

0–100
  • Significance40
    How much this matters to a regular citizen
  • Controversy10
    Intensity of disagreement among stakeholders
  • Entertainment5
    Compellingness for a non-policy-wonk reader
  • Buzz15
    Current news / social attention level

Publisher tools

Share or embed this record

POLISCOPE publisher tools

Share or embed this record