Lobbying Disclosure: Jacobs Facilities Inc. (Q1 2000)
June 20, 2026
Track this bill to get notified when it advances a stage. One tap to stop, anytime.
The Frame
This report identifies the entities paid to influence government decisions regarding program management services, which may impact how public contracts are awarded or managed within the Departments of Justice, Finance, and Corrections.
Potentially affected actors named in the source documents. Mention is not a position.
Jacobs Facilities Inc.
The company is the client paying for lobbying services to influence government policy or contracts.
Richard Robinson & Associates Inc.
The firm is the paid representative conducting lobbying activities on behalf of a client.
Last recorded activity June 20, 2026.
Next step not available in the current record.
Summary
Key Facts
- Jacobs Facilities Inc. paid Richard Robinson & Associates Inc. $12,275 for lobbying services.
- The reporting period for these payments was January 1, 2000, through March 31, 2000.
- Lobbying activities were directed at the Department of Justice, the Department of Finance, and the Department of Corrections.
- The subject of the lobbying activity was program management services.
Why It Matters
This report identifies the entities paid to influence government decisions regarding program management services, which may impact how public contracts are awarded or managed within the Departments of Justice, Finance, and Corrections.
Frequently Asked Questions
What is the purpose of this document?
Which government departments were contacted by the lobbyist?
News Coverage
Lobbying Activity
RICHARD ROBINSON & ASSOCIATES INC.
on behalf of JACOBS FACILITIES INC.
Discoveries
Patterns POLISCOPE noticed across the record. These are observations to investigate, not conclusions.
Multi-Agency Lobbying Focus
The lobbyist targeted three distinct departments (Justice, Finance, and Corrections) simultaneously for a single client, suggesting a broad scope for the program management services contract.
Connected Entities
Sources
www.sos.ca.gov
Analysis Score
0–100- Significance35How much this matters to a regular citizen
- Controversy10Intensity of disagreement among stakeholders
- Entertainment5Compellingness for a non-policy-wonk reader
- Buzz5Current news / social attention level
Publisher tools