Hearing on Transnational Repression by Autocratic Governments
January 1, 2019
Track this bill to get notified when it advances a stage. One tap to stop, anytime.
The Frame
The hearing highlights how foreign governments target individuals living abroad, which impacts the safety of residents and the integrity of international legal systems like .
Potentially affected actors named in the source documents. Mention is not a position.
Dissidents and human rights defenders living abroad
These individuals are the primary targets of the repressive tactics discussed in the hearing.
International legal institutions (e.g., INTERPOL)
These organizations are subject to potential misuse by autocratic states to facilitate the targeting of individuals.
Last recorded activity January 1, 2019.
Next step not available in the current record.
Summary
Key Facts
- The hearing took place on September 12, 2019, in the Cannon House Office Building.
- The Commission examined methods of transnational repression including hacking, surveillance, extortion, abduction, and assassination.
- The Commission expressed specific concern regarding the abuse of INTERPOL by autocratic states to target dissidents.
- The hearing featured testimony from experts in political science, human rights research, legal advocacy, and immigration law.
- The record includes prepared statements from individuals representing concerns regarding Uzbekistan, China, Tajikistan, Russia, and Turkey.
Frequently Asked Questions
What is transnational repression?
Why is the Helsinki Commission concerned about INTERPOL?
Why It Matters
The hearing highlights how foreign governments target individuals living abroad, which impacts the safety of residents and the integrity of international legal systems like .
News Coverage
Sponsors
Discoveries
Patterns POLISCOPE noticed across the record. These are observations to investigate, not conclusions.
Focus on INTERPOL abuse
The hearing highlights a specific policy concern regarding the weaponization of international police cooperation mechanisms for political purposes.
Connected Entities
Sources
www.govinfo.gov
Analysis Score
0–100- Significance75How much this matters to a regular citizen
- Controversy60Intensity of disagreement among stakeholders
- Entertainment20Compellingness for a non-policy-wonk reader
- Buzz30Current news / social attention level
Publisher tools