Senate Hearing Report: America's Demand for Drugs
January 1, 2017
Track this bill to get notified when it advances a stage. One tap to stop, anytime.
The Frame
The report provides the official record of expert testimony and government strategy discussions that inform federal drug control policies, border security operations, and public health funding priorities.
Potentially affected actors named in the source documents. Mention is not a position.
Federal Law Enforcement Agencies
These agencies are responsible for implementing the border security and drug interdiction strategies discussed in the hearings.
Public Health Organizations
These organizations are involved in the treatment and prevention strategies addressed by the committee.
Last recorded activity January 1, 2017.
Next step not available in the current record.
Summary
Key Facts
- The Senate Committee on Homeland Security and Governmental Affairs held three hearings in 2016 regarding drug demand: April 13, May 17, and June 15.
- The hearings included testimony from military leadership, public health experts, and federal agency directors.
- The scope of the hearings covered the federal response to drug demand, alternative policy approaches, and homeland security implications.
- The document includes prepared statements and responses to post-hearing questions from witnesses including General John F. Kelly and Michael P. Botticelli.
- The hearings were conducted during the 114th Congress, Second Session.
Frequently Asked Questions
What was the purpose of these hearings?
Who testified at these hearings?
Why It Matters
The report provides the official record of expert testimony and government strategy discussions that inform federal drug control policies, border security operations, and public health funding priorities.
News Coverage
Sponsors
Discoveries
Patterns POLISCOPE noticed across the record. These are observations to investigate, not conclusions.
Multi-session Hearing Structure
The committee utilized a three-part hearing structure over three months to separate the assessment of the current response from the exploration of alternative approaches.
Connected Entities
Sources
www.govinfo.gov
Analysis Score
0–100- Significance65How much this matters to a regular citizen
- Controversy40Intensity of disagreement among stakeholders
- Entertainment10Compellingness for a non-policy-wonk reader
- Buzz15Current news / social attention level
Publisher tools