POLISCOPE
Back to feed
Part ofenergy
FEDERALhearing transcript
High Impact

Congressional Hearing on EPA Power Plant Rules and the Ratepayer Protection Act

Original title: EPA'S PROPOSED 111(d) RULE FOR EXISTING POWER PLANTS AND H.R.

January 1, 2015

Track this bill to get notified when it advances a stage. One tap to stop, anytime.

The Frame

What this does

The hearing examined proposed federal regulations that could change how power plants operate and potentially impact electricity costs for consumers and businesses.

Who is mentioned in the record

Potentially affected actors named in the source documents. Mention is not a position.

Power plant operators

They must comply with new federal carbon emission guidelines if the proposed rule is finalized.

Electricity consumers

They may experience changes in electricity costs resulting from power plant compliance with new environmental regulations.

Environmental Protection Agency

The agency is responsible for drafting and implementing the proposed emission guidelines.

What changed

Last recorded activity January 1, 2015.

What's next

Next step not available in the current record.

Summary

This document is a transcript of a 2015 House Subcommittee hearing regarding the EPA's proposed carbon emission guidelines for existing power plants and a draft bill titled the ' Protection Act.' The hearing featured testimony from EPA officials, energy economists, and industry representatives regarding the potential impacts of these regulations.

Key Facts

  • The hearing was held on April 14, 2015, by the House Subcommittee on Energy and Power.
  • The primary subject was the EPA's proposed 111(d) rule, which sets carbon pollution emission guidelines for existing stationary sources (power plants).
  • The committee reviewed a discussion draft of the 'Ratepayer Protection Act.'
  • Witnesses included representatives from the EPA, the American Coalition for Clean Coal Electricity, the National Rural Electric Cooperative Association, and various energy and environmental policy experts.
  • The hearing record includes an analysis of the legal basis for the EPA's proposed rule submitted by Chairman Whitfield.
  • The record includes written testimony and answers to submitted questions from the witnesses.

Frequently Asked Questions

What is the 111(d) rule?
It is a proposed EPA regulation that establishes guidelines for carbon pollution emissions from existing power plants.
What is the purpose of the Ratepayer Protection Act?
The act was introduced as a discussion draft to address concerns regarding the potential impact of EPA regulations on electricity rates for consumers.

Why It Matters

The hearing examined proposed federal regulations that could change how power plants operate and potentially impact electricity costs for consumers and businesses.

News Coverage

No news coverage found yet. Articles are indexed twice daily.

Sponsors

Discoveries

Patterns POLISCOPE noticed across the record. These are observations to investigate, not conclusions.

policy shift90% confidence

Regulatory Conflict

The hearing highlights a direct legislative attempt to preempt or limit EPA regulatory authority through the proposed Ratepayer Protection Act.

Connected Entities

personEd WhitfieldChairman of the Subcommittee on Energy and PowerMap →
organizationAmerican Coalition for Clean Coal ElectricityRepresented by witness Eugene M. TriskoMap →
organizationEnvironmental Protection AgencyProposed the 111(d) rule for existing power plantsMap →
personJanet McCabeActing Assistant Administrator, EPA Office of Air and RadiationMap →
organizationNational Rural Electric Cooperative AssociationRepresented by witness Lisa D. JohnsonMap →

Sources

Open source document

www.govinfo.gov

Analysis Score

0–100
  • Significance80
    How much this matters to a regular citizen
  • Controversy75
    Intensity of disagreement among stakeholders
  • Entertainment10
    Compellingness for a non-policy-wonk reader
  • Buzz20
    Current news / social attention level

Publisher tools

Share or embed this record

POLISCOPE publisher tools

Share or embed this record