POLISCOPE
Back to feed
FEDERALhearing transcript

Congressional Hearing on Federal Support for High-Risk Urban Security

Original title: SECURING OUR COMMUNITIES: FEDERAL SUPPORT TO HIGH-RISK URBAN AREAS

January 1, 2018

Track this bill to get notified when it advances a stage. One tap to stop, anytime.

The Frame

What this does

The hearing examines the effectiveness of federal funding and intelligence-sharing programs that provide security resources to major metropolitan areas, directly impacting how local police, fire, and emergency management agencies are equipped to handle threats.

Who is mentioned in the record

Potentially affected actors named in the source documents. Mention is not a position.

Local Emergency Management Agencies

These agencies rely on federal grant programs and intelligence sharing to fund and coordinate their security and emergency response operations.

Federal Homeland Security Agencies

These agencies are responsible for administering the grants and intelligence protocols discussed during the hearing.

What changed

Last recorded activity January 1, 2018.

What's next

Next step not available in the current record.

Summary

This document is a transcript of a 2018 House Subcommittee hearing regarding how federal agencies provide security and emergency preparedness support to high-risk urban areas. The hearing featured testimony from federal officials and local New York/New Jersey emergency management leaders on grant programs and intelligence coordination.

Key Facts

  • The hearing was held on April 23, 2018, in Staten Island, New York.
  • The Subcommittee on Emergency Preparedness, Response, and Communications conducted the hearing to review federal support for high-risk urban areas.
  • Witnesses included representatives from the FBI, DHS Office of Intelligence and Analysis, FEMA, and the GAO.
  • Local witnesses included officials from the NYPD, FDNY, NYC Emergency Management, the Port Authority of NY/NJ, and the New Jersey Office of Homeland Security.
  • The hearing focused on the coordination of intelligence and the allocation of federal grant funding for emergency preparedness.
  • The document includes a formal request for follow-up questions from Ranking Member Donald M. Payne to FEMA Assistant Administrator Thomas DiNanno.

Frequently Asked Questions

What was the purpose of this hearing?
The hearing was held to evaluate how federal agencies support high-risk urban areas through intelligence sharing and emergency preparedness grants.
Who testified at the hearing?
The hearing featured two panels: one with federal officials from the FBI, DHS, FEMA, and GAO, and a second with local emergency management and security leaders from New York and New Jersey.

Why It Matters

The hearing examines the effectiveness of federal funding and intelligence-sharing programs that provide security resources to major metropolitan areas, directly impacting how local police, fire, and emergency management agencies are equipped to handle threats.

News Coverage

No news coverage found yet. Articles are indexed twice daily.

Sponsors

Discoveries

Patterns POLISCOPE noticed across the record. These are observations to investigate, not conclusions.

cross reference90% confidence

Regional Security Integration

The hearing highlights the integrated security approach between New York and New Jersey, specifically involving the Port Authority and state-level homeland security offices.

Connected Entities

personDaniel M. Donovan, Jr.Chairman of the Subcommittee on Emergency Preparedness, Response, and CommunicatMap →
organizationFederal Emergency Management AgencyProvided testimony on grant programsMap →
organizationNew York Police DepartmentProvided testimony on local counterterrorism needsMap →
organizationFederal Bureau of InvestigationProvided testimony on federal-local intelligence cooperationMap →
personDonald M. Payne, Jr.Ranking Member of the SubcommitteeMap →
organizationPort Authority of New York and New JerseyProvided testimony on regional security infrastructureMap →

Sources

Open source document

www.govinfo.gov

Analysis Score

0–100
  • Significance60
    How much this matters to a regular citizen
  • Controversy20
    Intensity of disagreement among stakeholders
  • Entertainment5
    Compellingness for a non-policy-wonk reader
  • Buzz10
    Current news / social attention level

Publisher tools

Share or embed this record

POLISCOPE publisher tools

Share or embed this record