POLISCOPE
Back to feed
FEDERALhearing transcript

Congressional Hearing on the Role of Community Colleges and Minority-Serving Institutions

Original title: ENGINES OF ECONOMIC MOBILITY: THE CRITICAL ROLE OF COMMUNITY COLLEGES, HISTORICALLY BLACK COLLEGES AND UNIVERSITIES, AND MINORITY-SERVING INSTITUTIONS IN PREPARING STUDENTS FOR SUCCESS

January 1, 2020

Track this bill to get notified when it advances a stage. One tap to stop, anytime.

The Frame

What this does

The hearing provides the official record of expert testimony and legislative inquiry that informs federal policy decisions regarding funding and support for community colleges and minority-serving institutions.

Who is mentioned in the record

Potentially affected actors named in the source documents. Mention is not a position.

Community College Students

Students at these institutions are the primary subjects of the policy discussions regarding educational support and workforce preparation.

Academic Institutions

Community colleges, HBCUs, and minority-serving institutions are the focus of potential federal funding and policy changes discussed in the hearing.

What changed

Last recorded activity January 1, 2020.

What's next

Next step not available in the current record.

Summary

This document is a transcript of a 2019 House Subcommittee hearing examining how community colleges, Historically Black Colleges and Universities (HBCUs), and other minority-serving institutions contribute to student success and economic mobility. The hearing featured testimony from academic leaders regarding the challenges and impacts of these institutions on the workforce.

Key Facts

  • The hearing took place on May 22, 2019, in Washington, DC.
  • The session was titled 'Engines of Economic Mobility: The Critical Role of Community Colleges, Historically Black Colleges and Universities, and Minority-Serving Institutions in Preparing Students for Success'.
  • The hearing included formal statements from the Chairwoman and Ranking Member.
  • Four academic leaders provided testimony regarding the role of their respective institutions.
  • The record includes additional submissions such as the 'Graduation Rate Initiative' and various letters from advocacy groups.
  • Several members of Congress submitted written questions for the record to the witnesses.
  • The witnesses provided formal written responses to the questions submitted for the record.

Why It Matters

The hearing provides the official record of expert testimony and legislative inquiry that informs federal policy decisions regarding funding and support for community colleges and minority-serving institutions.

Frequently Asked Questions

What was the purpose of this hearing?
The hearing was held to examine the role of community colleges, HBCUs, and minority-serving institutions in preparing students for the workforce and fostering economic mobility.
Who testified at the hearing?
The witnesses included Dr. Sandra L. Boham, Dr. Glenn Dubois, Dr. Patricia McHatton, and Dr. Reynold Verret.

News Coverage

No news coverage found yet. Articles are indexed twice daily.

Sponsors

Show 1 more sponsor

Discoveries

Patterns POLISCOPE noticed across the record. These are observations to investigate, not conclusions.

policy shift90% confidence

Focus on Economic Mobility

The hearing highlights a shift in legislative focus toward linking higher education outcomes directly to regional economic mobility.

Connected Entities

organizationSubcommittee on Higher Education and Workforce InvestmentThe congressional body that held the hearing.Map →
personDr. Glenn DuboisChancellor of the Virginia Community College System, witness.Map →
personDr. Patricia McHattonExecutive Vice President at the University of Texas Rio Grande Valley, witness.Map →
personSusan A. DavisChairwoman of the Subcommittee.Map →
personLloyd SmuckerRanking Member of the Subcommittee.Map →
personDr. Reynold VerretPresident of Xavier University of Louisiana, witness.Map →
personDr. Sandra L. BohamPresident of Salish Kootenai College, witness.Map →

Sources

Open source document

www.govinfo.gov

Analysis Score

0–100
  • Significance40
    How much this matters to a regular citizen
  • Controversy10
    Intensity of disagreement among stakeholders
  • Entertainment5
    Compellingness for a non-policy-wonk reader
  • Buzz10
    Current news / social attention level

Publisher tools

Share or embed this record

POLISCOPE publisher tools

Share or embed this record