POLISCOPE
Back to feed
FEDERALhearing transcript

Senate Hearing on Indo-Pacific Trade Strategy

Original title: THE PROMISE AND CHALLENGE OF STRATEGIC TRADE ENGAGEMENT IN THE INDO-PACIFIC REGION

January 1, 2024

Track this bill to get notified when it advances a stage. One tap to stop, anytime.

The Frame

What this does

This hearing marks the early legislative oversight of the Biden administration's proposed , which aims to set new trade rules that could impact American export markets, labor standards, and digital commerce regulations.

Who is mentioned in the record

Potentially affected actors named in the source documents. Mention is not a position.

American exporters

The proposed economic framework aims to establish new trade rules that could change market access for goods and services in the Indo-Pacific.

Digital technology companies

The committee is debating policies regarding internet freedom and censorship that could impact how these companies operate in foreign markets.

Labor unions

The framework under discussion seeks to establish labor rights standards that could influence the competitive landscape for American workers.

What changed

Last recorded activity January 1, 2024.

What's next

Next step not available in the current record.

Summary

The Senate Finance Committee held a hearing on March 15, 2022, to discuss the development of a new for trade engagement with countries in the region. The discussion focused on balancing economic opportunities for American workers with concerns regarding labor rights, environmental standards, and digital trade policies.

Key Facts

  • The hearing took place on March 15, 2022, in the Dirksen Senate Office Building.
  • The Indo-Pacific region represents half of the world's population.
  • The Biden administration initiated an effort to develop a wide-ranging economic framework with Indo-Pacific nations in late 2021.
  • Chairman Wyden identified the promotion of a free and open internet as a primary objective to counter authoritarian censorship laws.
  • The committee heard testimony from four witnesses representing trade, labor, and digital rights perspectives.
  • One in five jobs in Oregon is trade-related, according to Chairman Wyden.
  • The hearing included formal submissions from the Center for Fiscal Equity and the E-Merchants Trade Council, Inc.

Why It Matters

This hearing marks the early legislative oversight of the Biden administration's proposed , which aims to set new trade rules that could impact American export markets, labor standards, and digital commerce regulations.

Frequently Asked Questions

What is the purpose of this hearing?
The hearing was held to gather expert testimony and discuss priorities for a new economic trade framework being developed by the Biden administration for the region.
Who testified at the hearing?
Witnesses included Sharon Bomer Lauritsen (AgTrade Strategies), Emma Llanso (Center for Democracy and Technology), Kelly Ann Shaw (Hogan Lovells), and Michael Wessel (Labor Advisory Committee for Trade Negotiations).

News Coverage

No news coverage found yet. Articles are indexed twice daily.

Sponsors

Show 1 more sponsor

Discoveries

Patterns POLISCOPE noticed across the record. These are observations to investigate, not conclusions.

policy shift90% confidence

Focus on Digital Trade

The hearing highlights a shift toward integrating digital rights and internet freedom as core components of international trade negotiations.

Connected Entities

personSharon Bomer LauritsenWitness, Principal at AgTrade Strategies LLCMap →
personRon WydenChairman of the Senate Finance CommitteeMap →
personMichael WesselWitness, Staff Chair of Labor Advisory Committee for Trade NegotiationsMap →
organizationSenate Committee on FinanceCongressional committee overseeing trade policyMap →
personKelly Ann ShawWitness, former Deputy Assistant to the PresidentMap →
personEmma LlansoWitness, Director of Free Expression Project at Center for Democracy and TechnolMap →
personMike CrapoRanking member of the Senate Finance CommitteeMap →

Sources

Open source document

www.govinfo.gov

Analysis Score

0–100
  • Significance65
    How much this matters to a regular citizen
  • Controversy40
    Intensity of disagreement among stakeholders
  • Entertainment10
    Compellingness for a non-policy-wonk reader
  • Buzz20
    Current news / social attention level

Publisher tools

Share or embed this record

POLISCOPE publisher tools

Share or embed this record