New Rules for Candidate Qualifications
October 6, 2025
Track this bill to get notified when it advances a stage. One tap to stop, anytime.
Where This Stands
Currently Chapter No. 2026-25. The next step in the legislative lifecycle is Introduced.
Procedural history
37 actions- Feb 26, 2026HouseEnrolledOrdered enrolled
- Feb 26, 2026HouseIn Messages
- Feb 26, 2026SenateImmediately certified
- Feb 26, 2026SenateFloorCS passed; YEAS 37 NAYS 0
- Feb 26, 2026SenateFloorRead 3rd time
- Feb 26, 2026SenateFloorRead 2nd time
Show 31 earlier actions
- Feb 26, 2026SenateSubstituted for CS/SB 62
- Feb 26, 2026SenatePlaced on Calendar, on 2nd reading
- Feb 26, 2026SenateWithdrawn from Rules
- Feb 25, 2026SenateEnrolledReceived
- Feb 25, 2026SenateCommitteeReferred to Rules
- Feb 25, 2026SenateIn Messages
- Feb 25, 2026HouseFloorCS passed as amended; YEAS 113, NAYS 0
- Feb 25, 2026HouseFloorRead 3rd time
- Feb 25, 2026HouseAdded to Third Reading Calendar
- Feb 25, 2026HouseAmendment 384943 superseded by substitute
- Feb 25, 2026HouseAmendment 383023 adopted
- Feb 25, 2026HouseFloorRead 2nd time
- Feb 19, 2026HouseBill added to Special Order Calendar (2/25/2026)
- Feb 10, 2026HouseAdded to Second Reading Calendar
- Feb 10, 2026HouseBill released to House Calendar
- Feb 10, 2026HouseReported out of State Affairs Committee
- Feb 10, 2026HouseCommitteeFavorable by State Affairs Committee
- Feb 6, 2026HouseAdded to State Affairs Committee agenda
- Jan 13, 2026HouseIntroduced1st Reading (Committee Substitute 1)
- Jan 13, 2026HouseIntroduced1st Reading (Original Filed Version)
- Dec 12, 2025HouseNow in State Affairs Committee
- Dec 12, 2025HouseCommitteeReferred to State Affairs Committee
- Dec 11, 2025HouseIntroducedCS Filed
- Dec 11, 2025HouseLaid on Table under Rule 7.18(a)
- Dec 10, 2025HouseReported out of Government Operations Subcommittee
- Dec 10, 2025HouseCommitteeFavorable with CS by Government Operations Subcommittee
- Dec 3, 2025HouseAdded to Government Operations Subcommittee agenda
- Oct 14, 2025HouseNow in Government Operations Subcommittee
- Oct 14, 2025HouseCommitteeReferred to State Affairs Committee
- Oct 14, 2025HouseCommitteeReferred to Government Operations Subcommittee
- Oct 6, 2025HouseIntroducedFiled
Version history
Only one version on file - nothing to compare yet. As later stages (committee substitute, engrossed, enrolled) are captured, the redline appears here.
View official text →The Frame
This law changes the eligibility requirements for anyone seeking public office in Florida, potentially dis candidates who recently switched parties or changed their names through court petitions.
Potentially affected actors named in the source documents. Mention is not a position.
Political candidates
Must meet specific 365-day registration and name-change history requirements to qualify for the ballot.
Political parties
Authorized to challenge the eligibility of opposing candidates in court based on these new requirements.
Last recorded activity October 6, 2025.
Introduced.
Summary
Key Facts
You don't have to trust us. Each fact below is taken straight from the official document - click any one to see the exact passage, highlighted in the original.
Frequently Asked Questions
Does this law apply if I changed my name because I got married?
How can someone challenge a candidate's eligibility under this law?
What happens if a court finds a candidate did not meet the 365-day registration requirement?
Why It Matters
This law changes the eligibility requirements for anyone seeking public office in Florida, potentially dis candidates who recently switched parties or changed their names through court petitions.
News Coverage
Voting Record
Third Reading
Total
46
Yes
42
No
0
Present
0
Not Voting
0
Abstain
0
How they voted (46)
Dave Smith
Republican · yes
Shev Jones
Democratic · yes
Bryan Ávila
Republican · yes
Joe Gruters
Republican · excused
Ralph Massullo
Republican · yes
Tommy Wright
Republican · yes
Danny Burgess
Republican · yes
Alexis Calatayud
Republican · yes
LaVon Bracy Davis
Democratic · yes
Jonathan Martin
Republican · yes
Colleen Burton
Republican · yes
Lori Berman
Democratic · yes
Gayle Harrell
Republican · yes
Ileana Garcia
Republican · yes
Jay Trumbull
Republican · yes
Clay Yarborough
Republican · yes
Shev Jones
Democratic · yes
Rosalind Osgood
Democratic · yes
Tom Leek
Republican · yes
Kathleen Passidomo
Republican · yes
Joe Gruters
Republican · excused
Jim Boyd
Republican · yes
Bryan Ávila
Republican · yes
Ben Albritton
Republican · yes
+ 22 more
Passage, Third Reading
Total
203
Yes
195
No
0
Present
0
Not Voting
8
Abstain
0
How they voted (203)
Rachel Plakon
Republican · yes
Nan Cobb
Republican · yes
Jenna Persons-Mulicka
Republican · absent
Griff Griffitts
Republican · yes
Kim Daniels
Democratic · yes
Jim Mooney
Republican · yes
Susan Valdés
Republican · yes
Lawrence McClure
Republican · yes
Sam Greco
Republican · yes
Fiona McFarland
Republican · yes
Sam Garrison
Republican · yes
Fabián Basabe
Republican · yes
Kim Kendall
Republican · yes
Doug Bankson
Republican · yes
Ashley Gantt
Democratic · yes
Jose Alvarez
Democratic · yes
J.J. Grow
Republican · yes
Jennifer Canady
Republican · yes
Wallace Aristide
Democratic · yes
JOHN SNYDER
- · yes
Danny Nix
Republican · yes
Tae Edmonds
Democratic · yes
Shane Abbott
Republican · yes
Tiffany Esposito
Republican · yes
+ 179 more
Sponsors
Discoveries
Patterns POLISCOPE noticed across the record. These are observations to investigate, not conclusions.
Standardization of Enforcement
The law explicitly designates the circuit court as the 'sole method' for enforcing these candidate requirements, centralizing the dispute process.
Connected Entities
Sources
openstates.org
Analysis Score
0–100- Significance85How much this matters to a regular citizen
- Controversy60Intensity of disagreement among stakeholders
- Entertainment10Compellingness for a non-policy-wonk reader
- Buzz40Current news / social attention level
Publisher tools