Senate Hearing on Retirement Savings Access
January 1, 2016
Track this bill to get notified when it advances a stage. One tap to stop, anytime.
The Frame
This hearing serves as a foundational discussion for potential legislative changes to retirement savings incentives, which directly impact how millions of Americans save for retirement through their employers.
Potentially affected actors named in the source documents. Mention is not a position.
Employees
Changes to retirement policy could alter the availability and structure of savings plans offered by their employers.
Employers
Legislative changes may impact the incentives or requirements for offering retirement savings plans to their workforce.
Last recorded activity January 1, 2016.
Next step not available in the current record.
Summary
Key Facts
- The hearing took place on January 28, 2016, in the Dirksen Senate Office Building.
- The primary objective was to discuss increasing access, participation, and coverage in retirement savings plans.
- The committee focused on the role of 401(k) plans and IRAs as primary wealth-creation tools for the middle class.
- Witnesses included experts from academia, the financial sector, and the Joint Committee on Taxation.
- The hearing included testimony and prepared statements from Alicia H. Munnell, John J. Kalamarides, and Thomas A. Barthold.
- Several organizations submitted communications for the record, including the ERISA Industry Committee and the ESOP Association.
Frequently Asked Questions
What was the purpose of this hearing?
Who testified at the hearing?
Why It Matters
This hearing serves as a foundational discussion for potential legislative changes to retirement savings incentives, which directly impact how millions of Americans save for retirement through their employers.
News Coverage
Sponsors
Discoveries
Patterns POLISCOPE noticed across the record. These are observations to investigate, not conclusions.
Focus on Employer Incentives
The hearing highlights a shift toward incentivizing employers to adopt retirement plans rather than mandating them, focusing on the 'status quo' of 401(k) success.
Connected Entities
Sources
www.govinfo.gov
Analysis Score
0–100- Significance60How much this matters to a regular citizen
- Controversy20Intensity of disagreement among stakeholders
- Entertainment5Compellingness for a non-policy-wonk reader
- Buzz10Current news / social attention level
Publisher tools