POLISCOPE
Back to feed
FEDERALhearing transcript

Senate Budget Committee Hearing: Immigration and Economic Growth

Original title: UNLOCKING AMERICA'S POTENTIAL: HOW IMMIGRATION FUELS ECONOMIC GROWTH AND OUR COMPETITIVE ADVANTAGE

January 1, 2024

Track this bill to get notified when it advances a stage. One tap to stop, anytime.

The Frame

What this does

This hearing serves as a formal record of expert testimony and legislative debate regarding how immigration policy influences the U.S. economy and federal budget, which informs future potential policy changes affecting visa programs and labor regulations.

Who is mentioned in the record

Potentially affected actors named in the source documents. Mention is not a position.

Immigrant workers

The hearing discussed policies that determine visa eligibility and labor market participation for foreign-born workers.

U.S. taxpayers

The committee examined how immigration trends influence federal spending, tax revenue, and the national debt.

What changed

Last recorded activity January 1, 2024.

What's next

Next step not available in the current record.

Summary

The Senate Budget Committee held a hearing on September 13, 2023, to examine the relationship between immigration, U.S. economic growth, and national competitiveness. Experts and Senators discussed how immigration policies impact the federal budget, labor markets, and the nation's long-term fiscal health.

Key Facts

  • The hearing took place on September 13, 2023, in the Dirksen Senate Office Building.
  • The session was chaired by Senator Sheldon Whitehouse with participation from Senator Alex Padilla.
  • Five expert witnesses provided testimony on the economic impacts of immigration.
  • The hearing explored the link between immigration levels and U.S. global competitive advantage.
  • The committee reviewed the role of immigration in addressing federal budget deficits and debt-to-GDP ratios.
  • Written statements were submitted for the record by organizations including the AFL-CIO, Improve the Dream, and Refugees International.
  • The hearing included responses to post-hearing questions from witnesses David Bier, Robert Rector, and Ronil Hira.

Why It Matters

This hearing serves as a formal record of expert testimony and legislative debate regarding how immigration policy influences the U.S. economy and federal budget, which informs future potential policy changes affecting visa programs and labor regulations.

Frequently Asked Questions

What was the purpose of this hearing?
The hearing was held to discuss how immigration affects economic growth and the nation's competitive advantage, as well as its implications for the federal budget.
Who testified at the hearing?
Witnesses included Dr. Britta Glennon (Wharton), Mr. David Bier (Cato Institute), Mr. Laurens Van Beek (Software Developer), Mr. Robert Rector (Heritage Foundation), and Dr. Ronil Hira (Howard University).

News Coverage

No news coverage found yet. Articles are indexed twice daily.

Sponsors

Show 3 more sponsors

Discoveries

Patterns POLISCOPE noticed across the record. These are observations to investigate, not conclusions.

policy shift90% confidence

Bipartisan Budget Focus

The hearing highlights a shift toward framing immigration policy specifically through the lens of federal budget sustainability and debt management.

Connected Entities

personDavid BierWitness, Cato InstituteMap →
personLaurens Van BeekWitness, Software DeveloperMap →
personRobert RectorWitness, The Heritage FoundationMap →
personAlex PadillaSenator co-chairing the hearingMap →
personRonil HiraWitness, Howard UniversityMap →
personBritta GlennonWitness, Assistant Professor at WhartonMap →
personCharles E. GrassleyRanking Member of the Senate Budget CommitteeMap →
personSheldon WhitehouseChairman of the Senate Budget CommitteeMap →
organizationSenate Committee on the BudgetOrganizing body of the hearingMap →

Sources

Open source document

www.govinfo.gov

Analysis Score

0–100
  • Significance65
    How much this matters to a regular citizen
  • Controversy50
    Intensity of disagreement among stakeholders
  • Entertainment10
    Compellingness for a non-policy-wonk reader
  • Buzz20
    Current news / social attention level

Publisher tools

Share or embed this record

POLISCOPE publisher tools

Share or embed this record