POLISCOPE
Back to feed
FEDERALhearing transcript

Senate Roundtable: The 2016 Agricultural Economic Outlook

Original title: A ROUNDTABLE DISCUSSION ON THE STATE OF THE FARM ECONOMY

January 1, 2015

Track this bill to get notified when it advances a stage. One tap to stop, anytime.

The Frame

What this does

This discussion provides the economic context for upcoming federal budget decisions regarding the U.S. Department of Agriculture and the Food and Drug Administration.

Who is mentioned in the record

Potentially affected actors named in the source documents. Mention is not a position.

U.S. agricultural producers

They face a more competitive international trade environment and shifting export demand for specific commodities.

Agribusinesses

They are subject to the economic conditions and trade fluctuations discussed by the committee.

What changed

Last recorded activity January 1, 2015.

What's next

Next step not available in the current record.

Summary

A Senate subcommittee held a roundtable discussion with agricultural economists to review the economic outlook for U.S. farmers and agribusinesses in 2016. The discussion focused on how global economic trends, such as slowing growth in China and a strong U.S. dollar, are impacting agricultural exports and domestic farm income.

Key Facts

  • U.S. agricultural exports are forecast at $125 billion for fiscal year 2016, a 10.5% decrease from the previous year.
  • One-third of the decline in agricultural exports is attributed to reduced sales to China.
  • China's GDP growth is projected to slow to 6.1% in 2016, with a long-term trend toward 5%.
  • Grain and feed exports are projected to decrease by $4.4 billion.
  • Soybean exports are projected to decrease by $6.3 billion, though volume is expected to remain the second-highest on record at 46 million metric tons.
  • Cotton exports are forecast to drop by $900 million due to shrinking global demand.
  • Rice exports are forecast to drop by $300 million due to volume declines.
  • A strong U.S. dollar makes it more difficult to export products to countries with weaker currencies like Egypt and Nigeria.
  • A strong U.S. dollar makes it easier for U.S. buyers to import agricultural inputs like fertilizer from countries like Canada, Russia, and Ukraine.
  • 80% of U.S. agricultural products are sold domestically, meaning a strong U.S. economy provides significant support for the sector.
  • The subcommittee plans to begin the appropriations process for the FDA and USDA immediately following this roundtable.

Why It Matters

This discussion provides the economic context for upcoming federal budget decisions regarding the U.S. Department of Agriculture and the Food and Drug Administration.

Frequently Asked Questions

Why are U.S. agricultural exports expected to drop in 2016?
The decline is largely driven by a strong U.S. dollar, which makes American goods more expensive for foreign buyers, and slowing economic growth in major markets like China.
Does a strong U.S. dollar hurt farmers?
It creates a mixed environment; while it makes exporting products more difficult, it also makes importing necessary inputs like fertilizer cheaper and supports domestic demand through a stronger U.S. economy.

News Coverage

Sponsors

Discoveries

Patterns POLISCOPE noticed across the record. These are observations to investigate, not conclusions.

policy shift90% confidence

Shift from Micro to Macro Drivers

The USDA Chief Economist noted a transition in the agricultural outlook from being driven by local factors like drought and energy prices to global macroeconomic factors like currency values and Chinese GDP growth.

Connected Entities

personJerry MoranChairman of the Subcommittee on Agriculture, Rural Development, Food and Drug AdMap →
personPatrick WesthoffDirector of the Food and Agriculture Policy Research Institute at the UniversityMap →
organizationU.S. Department of AgricultureFederal department overseeing agricultural policyMap →
organizationFood and Drug AdministrationFederal agency subject to upcoming appropriationsMap →
personNathan KauffmanLead expert in agricultural economics at the Kansas City Federal ReserveMap →
personRobert JohanssonChief Economist at the USDAMap →

Sources

Open source document

www.govinfo.gov

Analysis Score

0–100
  • Significance60
    How much this matters to a regular citizen
  • Controversy10
    Intensity of disagreement among stakeholders
  • Entertainment5
    Compellingness for a non-policy-wonk reader
  • Buzz15
    Current news / social attention level

Publisher tools

Share or embed this record

POLISCOPE publisher tools

Share or embed this record