POLISCOPE
Back to feed
FEDERALhearing transcript

Senate Hearing on Data Security and Privacy Standards

Original title: ENHANCING DATA SECURITY

January 1, 2024

Track this bill to get notified when it advances a stage. One tap to stop, anytime.

The Frame

What this does

This hearing serves as a legislative foundation for potential future federal regulations that could mandate how companies store and protect consumer data, directly impacting the security protocols businesses must implement and the privacy rights of individuals.

Who is mentioned in the record

Potentially affected actors named in the source documents. Mention is not a position.

American consumers

Individuals whose personal data is subject to security breaches and potential future federal privacy protections.

Federal Trade Commission

The agency is being considered for expanded resources and a new internal bureau to manage data privacy.

Technology companies

Businesses may be subject to new federal data security standards and compliance requirements.

What changed

Last recorded activity January 1, 2024.

What's next

Next step not available in the current record.

Summary

The Senate Committee on Commerce, Science, and Transportation held a hearing on October 6, 2021, to discuss federal standards for data security and privacy. The session focused on addressing the rising frequency of data breaches and the need for enhanced protections for American consumers.

Key Facts

  • The hearing took place on October 6, 2021, in the Russell Senate Office Building.
  • This was the second in a series of hearings regarding federal standards for privacy and data security.
  • The committee discussed providing the Federal Trade Commission (FTC) with new resources and establishing a Data Privacy Bureau.
  • The hearing addressed the increasing rate of data breaches affecting hundreds of millions of American consumers.
  • Four expert witnesses provided testimony and prepared statements regarding data security.
  • The committee members engaged in a question-and-answer session with witnesses following opening statements.
  • The appendix includes responses to written follow-up questions submitted by various Senators to the witnesses.

Frequently Asked Questions

What was the purpose of this hearing?
The hearing was held to examine data security vulnerabilities and discuss the need for federal standards to protect consumer privacy.
Who testified at the hearing?
Witnesses included James E. Lee (Identity Theft Resource Center), Jessica L. Rich (Kelley Drye & Warren), Edward W. Felten (Princeton University), and Kate Tummarello (Engine).

Why It Matters

This hearing serves as a legislative foundation for potential future federal regulations that could mandate how companies store and protect consumer data, directly impacting the security protocols businesses must implement and the privacy rights of individuals.

News Coverage

No news coverage found yet. Articles are indexed twice daily.

Sponsors

Show 1 more sponsor

Discoveries

Patterns POLISCOPE noticed across the record. These are observations to investigate, not conclusions.

policy shift90% confidence

Focus on FTC Expansion

The hearing highlights a clear legislative intent to empower the FTC with a dedicated Data Privacy Bureau, signaling a shift toward more centralized federal oversight of data security.

Connected Entities

personMaria CantwellChair of the Senate Committee on Commerce, Science, and TransportationMap →
personKate TummarelloExecutive Director, EngineMap →
personJessica L. RichOf Counsel, Kelley Drye & WarrenMap →
personRoger WickerRanking Member of the CommitteeMap →
organizationFederal Trade CommissionPrimary federal agency discussed regarding data privacy enforcementMap →
personEdward W. FeltenProfessor at Princeton University and former FTC Chief TechnologistMap →
personJames E. LeeChief Operating Officer, Identity Theft Resource CenterMap →

Sources

Open source document

www.govinfo.gov

Analysis Score

0–100
  • Significance65
    How much this matters to a regular citizen
  • Controversy20
    Intensity of disagreement among stakeholders
  • Entertainment5
    Compellingness for a non-policy-wonk reader
  • Buzz10
    Current news / social attention level

Publisher tools

Share or embed this record

POLISCOPE publisher tools

Share or embed this record