Congressional Hearing: Assessing Suspicious Activity Reporting Efforts
January 1, 2018
Track this bill to get notified when it advances a stage. One tap to stop, anytime.
The Frame
This hearing examines the operational effectiveness of national programs that rely on public and law enforcement reporting to identify potential terrorist threats, which directly impacts how federal and local agencies allocate resources for domestic security.
Potentially affected actors named in the source documents. Mention is not a position.
Law Enforcement Agencies
These agencies are responsible for implementing and managing the suspicious activity reporting protocols discussed in the hearing.
Department of Homeland Security
The department oversees federal intelligence operations and coordinates with state and local partners on security reporting.
Last recorded activity January 1, 2018.
Next step not available in the current record.
Summary
Key Facts
- The hearing took place on September 13, 2017, in the Capitol Visitor Center.
- The session focused on assessing the status and efficacy of suspicious activity reporting (SAR) efforts 16 years post-9/11.
- Four witnesses provided testimony: representatives from the Department of Homeland Security, New Jersey State Police, Boston Police Department, and the Northern Virginia Regional Intelligence Center.
- The hearing was conducted by the Subcommittee on Counterterrorism and Intelligence of the House Committee on Homeland Security.
Frequently Asked Questions
What is the purpose of this hearing?
Who testified at the hearing?
Why It Matters
This hearing examines the operational effectiveness of national programs that rely on public and law enforcement reporting to identify potential terrorist threats, which directly impacts how federal and local agencies allocate resources for domestic security.
News Coverage
Sponsors
Show 1 more sponsor
Discoveries
Patterns POLISCOPE noticed across the record. These are observations to investigate, not conclusions.
Post-9/11 Policy Review
The hearing explicitly frames its inquiry around the 16-year anniversary of the 9/11 attacks, indicating a periodic review of long-standing counterterrorism infrastructure.
Connected Entities
Sources
www.govinfo.gov
Analysis Score
0–100- Significance60How much this matters to a regular citizen
- Controversy20Intensity of disagreement among stakeholders
- Entertainment10Compellingness for a non-policy-wonk reader
- Buzz15Current news / social attention level
Publisher tools