Lobbying Disclosure: Lyft's Legislative and Administrative Priorities (Q3 2019)
July 1, 2019
Track this bill to get notified when it advances a stage. One tap to stop, anytime.
The Frame
This filing identifies the specific policy areas—including rideshare taxes and Divvy bike-share expansion—that Lyft sought to influence within Chicago city government during the third quarter of 2019.
Potentially affected actors named in the source documents. Mention is not a position.
Lyft
The company is seeking to influence the regulatory and tax environment for its operations in Chicago.
Chicago residents
Residents are subject to the rideshare regulations and tax policies that the company is attempting to influence.
Last recorded activity July 1, 2019.
Next step not available in the current record.
Summary
Key Facts
- Lobbyist John F. Dunn represented Lyft during the period of July 1, 2019, to September 30, 2019.
- The lobbying activity targeted the Chicago Legislative Council and Government Affairs department.
- The scope of lobbying included both administrative and legislative actions.
- Lyft sought to influence city policy regarding rideshare operations.
- Lyft sought to influence city policy regarding rideshare legislation and regulations.
- Lyft sought to influence city policy regarding rideshare taxes.
- Lyft sought to influence city policy regarding the expansion of the Divvy bike-share program.
Why It Matters
This filing identifies the specific policy areas—including rideshare taxes and Divvy bike-share expansion—that Lyft sought to influence within Chicago city government during the third quarter of 2019.
Frequently Asked Questions
What is the purpose of this document?
What specific issues was Lyft interested in during this time?
News Coverage
Lobbying Activity
JOHN F DUNN
on behalf of LYFT
Sponsors
Discoveries
Patterns POLISCOPE noticed across the record. These are observations to investigate, not conclusions.
Connected Entities
Sources
data.cityofchicago.org
Analysis Score
0–100- Significance45How much this matters to a regular citizen
- Controversy30Intensity of disagreement among stakeholders
- Entertainment10Compellingness for a non-policy-wonk reader
- Buzz15Current news / social attention level
Publisher tools