POLISCOPE
Back to feed
FEDERALhearing transcript
High Impact

Hearing on Net Neutrality Legislation (March 2019)

Original title: LEGISLATING TO SAFEGUARD THE FREE AND OPEN INTERNET

January 1, 2020

Track this bill to get notified when it advances a stage. One tap to stop, anytime.

The Frame

What this does

The hearing explored legislative efforts to define how internet service providers manage data traffic, which impacts the speed, cost, and accessibility of internet services for all U.S. residents.

Who is mentioned in the record

Potentially affected actors named in the source documents. Mention is not a position.

Internet Service Providers

Legislation discussed in the hearing would establish regulatory requirements for how these companies manage network traffic.

Internet Users

Changes to net neutrality rules impact the speed and accessibility of content available to consumers.

What changed

Last recorded activity January 1, 2020.

What's next

Next step not available in the current record.

Summary

This document is a transcript of a 2019 House subcommittee hearing regarding potential legislation to establish '' rules for internet service providers. The hearing featured testimony from policy experts and industry representatives regarding the regulation of internet traffic.

Key Facts

  • The hearing took place on March 12, 2019, in the 116th Congress.
  • The primary subject was the legislative approach to safeguarding a 'free and open internet'.
  • Four witnesses provided testimony: Francella Ochillo, Gregory Green, Robert M. McDowell, and Matthew F. Wood.
  • The hearing included the submission of various letters, dissenting statements, and articles regarding net neutrality policy.
  • The record includes written answers to follow-up questions submitted by witnesses Gregory Green, Robert M. McDowell, and Matthew F. Wood.

Frequently Asked Questions

What is the purpose of this hearing?
The hearing was held to discuss potential legislation aimed at protecting and ensuring an open internet.
Who testified at this hearing?
The witnesses included representatives from the National Hispanic Media Coalition, Fatbeam, the Hudson Institute, and the Free Press Action Fund.

Why It Matters

The hearing explored legislative efforts to define how internet service providers manage data traffic, which impacts the speed, cost, and accessibility of internet services for all U.S. residents.

News Coverage

No news coverage found yet. Articles are indexed twice daily.

Sponsors

Show 1 more sponsor

Discoveries

Patterns POLISCOPE noticed across the record. These are observations to investigate, not conclusions.

cross reference100% confidence

Historical Policy Debate

The hearing record incorporates documents dating back to 2008 and 2010, illustrating the long-standing nature of the net neutrality debate in Congress.

Connected Entities

personRobert E. LattaRanking Member of the SubcommitteeMap →
personRobert M. McDowellWitness, Senior Fellow at Hudson InstituteMap →
personFrancella OchilloWitness, VP of Policy at National Hispanic Media CoalitionMap →
personMatthew F. WoodWitness, VP of Policy at Free Press Action FundMap →
personGregory GreenWitness, CEO of FatbeamMap →
personMike DoyleChairman of the Subcommittee on Communications and TechnologyMap →
organizationSubcommittee on Communications and TechnologyCongressional body holding the hearingMap →

Sources

Open source document

www.govinfo.gov

Analysis Score

0–100
  • Significance75
    How much this matters to a regular citizen
  • Controversy80
    Intensity of disagreement among stakeholders
  • Entertainment20
    Compellingness for a non-policy-wonk reader
  • Buzz30
    Current news / social attention level

Publisher tools

Share or embed this record

POLISCOPE publisher tools

Share or embed this record