POLISCOPE
Back to feed
FEDERALhearing transcript

Congressional Hearing on Federal Protective Service Reorganization

Original title: FEDERAL PROTECTIVE SERVICE: ENSURING THE MISSION IS NOT LOST IN TRANSITION

January 1, 2019

Track this bill to get notified when it advances a stage. One tap to stop, anytime.

The Frame

What this does

The hearing addresses the administrative oversight and structural placement of the agency responsible for protecting federal buildings and their occupants, which impacts how resources and personnel are allocated to secure government facilities.

Who is mentioned in the record

Potentially affected actors named in the source documents. Mention is not a position.

Federal Protective Service Employees

The organizational transition changes the reporting structure and administrative support provided to the agency's personnel.

Department of Homeland Security

The department is responsible for managing the internal transfer of the FPS between its directorates.

What changed

Last recorded activity January 1, 2019.

What's next

Next step not available in the current record.

Summary

This hearing transcript documents a 2019 Congressional review of the Federal Protective Service (FPS) and its planned transition from the Cybersecurity and Infrastructure Security Agency () to the Department of Homeland Security's (DHS) . The committee examined the history of FPS's placement within DHS and the challenges the agency has faced in maintaining its mission during previous organizational shifts.

Key Facts

  • The Federal Protective Service (FPS) was established in 1971 by the General Services Administration.
  • FPS was moved under the Department of Homeland Security (DHS) following the department's formation in 2002.
  • FPS was initially placed under Immigration and Customs Enforcement (ICE) within DHS.
  • FPS personnel levels decreased from over 1,400 to approximately 1,000 during its time under ICE.
  • In 2009, FPS was moved to the National Protection and Programs Directorate (NPPD).
  • In 2018, NPPD was redesignated as the Cybersecurity and Infrastructure Security Agency (CISA).
  • The hearing was held on June 11, 2019, to discuss moving FPS to the DHS Management Directorate.

Frequently Asked Questions

What is the Federal Protective Service?
The FPS is the federal agency responsible for protecting buildings, grounds, and property owned or occupied by the federal government.
Why is the FPS moving to the DHS Management Directorate?
The transition is intended to address historical challenges the agency has faced in finding the appropriate structural placement within DHS to support its mission.

Why It Matters

The hearing addresses the administrative oversight and structural placement of the agency responsible for protecting federal buildings and their occupants, which impacts how resources and personnel are allocated to secure government facilities.

News Coverage

No news coverage found yet. Articles are indexed twice daily.

Sponsors

Discoveries

Patterns POLISCOPE noticed across the record. These are observations to investigate, not conclusions.

policy shift90% confidence

Historical Agency Instability

The FPS has undergone multiple organizational shifts since 2002, indicating a long-term struggle to align its mission with the appropriate DHS directorate.

Connected Entities

personXochitl Torres SmallChairwoman of the Subcommittee on Oversight, Management, and AccountabilityMap →
organizationFederal Protective ServiceThe primary agency responsible for protecting federal facilitiesMap →
personL. Eric PattersonDirector of the Federal Protective ServiceMap →
organizationCybersecurity and Infrastructure Security AgencyCurrent agency housing the FPS at the time of the hearingMap →
organizationDepartment of Homeland SecurityParent department for the FPSMap →
personLori RectanusDirector of the Physical Infrastructure Team at the GAOMap →

Sources

Open source document

www.govinfo.gov

Analysis Score

0–100
  • Significance60
    How much this matters to a regular citizen
  • Controversy20
    Intensity of disagreement among stakeholders
  • Entertainment10
    Compellingness for a non-policy-wonk reader
  • Buzz15
    Current news / social attention level

Publisher tools

Share or embed this record

POLISCOPE publisher tools

Share or embed this record