House Judiciary Committee Hearing on Donald McGahn Subpoena
January 1, 2019
Track this bill to get notified when it advances a stage. One tap to stop, anytime.
The Frame
The hearing addresses the legal conflict between Congressional power and the executive branch's claim of for senior presidential advisors, which determines the extent of legislative oversight into executive actions.
Potentially affected actors named in the source documents. Mention is not a position.
Donald F. McGahn II
He was the subject of a congressional subpoena and a White House directive regarding his testimony.
House Judiciary Committee
The committee is attempting to exercise its oversight authority through the subpoena process.
Last recorded activity January 1, 2019.
Next step not available in the current record.
Summary
Key Facts
- The hearing was held on May 21, 2019, in the Rayburn House Office Building.
- Donald F. McGahn II did not appear at the hearing despite being subpoenaed by the committee.
- The White House directed Mr. McGahn not to appear, citing 'absolute immunity' for senior presidential advisors.
- Chairman Nadler stated that the committee rejects the claim of absolute immunity, citing a 2007 judicial ruling by Judge John Bates regarding Harriet Miers.
- The hearing was convened to conduct oversight regarding the report by Special Counsel Robert Mueller III.
- The committee record includes opening statements from Chairman Nadler and Ranking Member Doug Collins.
Frequently Asked Questions
Did Donald McGahn testify at this hearing?
Why did the White House say Mr. McGahn could not testify?
Why It Matters
The hearing addresses the legal conflict between Congressional power and the executive branch's claim of for senior presidential advisors, which determines the extent of legislative oversight into executive actions.
News Coverage
Sponsors
Show 1 more sponsor
Discoveries
Patterns POLISCOPE noticed across the record. These are observations to investigate, not conclusions.
Historical Precedent
The committee explicitly relied on the 2007 Harriet Miers case to challenge the current administration's claim of absolute immunity.
Connected Entities
Sources
www.govinfo.gov
Analysis Score
0–100- Significance90How much this matters to a regular citizen
- Controversy95Intensity of disagreement among stakeholders
- Entertainment75Compellingness for a non-policy-wonk reader
- Buzz80Current news / social attention level
Publisher tools