Lobbying Disclosure: BOMA Chicago Pension Reform Advocacy
January 1, 2014
Track this bill to get notified when it advances a stage. One tap to stop, anytime.
The Frame
This disclosure identifies the professional representation hired by commercial building owners to influence city-level pension reform legislation and administrative policy during the first quarter of 2014.
Potentially affected actors named in the source documents. Mention is not a position.
BOMA Chicago members
Commercial office building owners and managers are represented in city-level discussions regarding pension reform ordinances.
Chicago taxpayers
Taxpayers are affected by the outcome of pension reform legislation and the resulting impact on city financial obligations.
Last recorded activity January 1, 2014.
Next step not available in the current record.
Summary
Key Facts
- Lobbyist Mary K. Minaghan (MKM Services) represented BOMA Chicago.
- The lobbying period covered January 1, 2014, through March 31, 2014.
- The lobbying activity targeted the Chicago Department of Finance.
- The scope of work included both administrative and legislative actions.
- The primary objective was to communicate the views of commercial office building owners regarding pending ordinances, specifically pension reform.
Why It Matters
This disclosure identifies the professional representation hired by commercial building owners to influence city-level pension reform legislation and administrative policy during the first quarter of 2014.
Frequently Asked Questions
What is BOMA Chicago?
What specific pension reforms were discussed?
News Coverage
Sponsors
Discoveries
Patterns POLISCOPE noticed across the record. These are observations to investigate, not conclusions.
Pension Reform Focus
The document highlights that commercial real estate interests were actively engaging with the Department of Finance regarding pension reform in early 2014.
Connected Entities
Sources
data.cityofchicago.org
Analysis Score
0–100- Significance40How much this matters to a regular citizen
- Controversy30Intensity of disagreement among stakeholders
- Entertainment5Compellingness for a non-policy-wonk reader
- Buzz10Current news / social attention level
Publisher tools