POLISCOPE
Back to feed
FEDERALhearing transcript
High Impact

2016 Military Construction Budget Hearing

Original title: MILITARY CONSTRUCTION, VETERANS AFFAIRS, AND RELATED AGENCIES APPROPRIATIONS FOR FISCAL YEAR 2016

January 1, 2015

Track this bill to get notified when it advances a stage. One tap to stop, anytime.

The Frame

What this does

The hearing outlines the funding priorities for military infrastructure, including barracks, training centers, and child care facilities, which directly impacts the living and working conditions of service members and their families.

Who is mentioned in the record

Potentially affected actors named in the source documents. Mention is not a position.

Active Duty Soldiers and Families

The budget determines the quality and availability of housing, fitness centers, and child care facilities on military installations.

Army National Guard and Reserve

These branches receive specific allocations within the MILCON budget for their respective facility construction needs.

What changed

Last recorded activity January 1, 2015.

What's next

Next step not available in the current record.

Summary

The Senate Appropriations Subcommittee reviewed the Department of Defense's $8.4 billion fiscal year 2016 military construction () budget request. Army leadership testified that while the request represents a 37% increase for the Army over the previous year, it remains significantly lower than 2013 and 2014 levels, necessitating a focus on essential readiness and facility repairs.

Key Facts

  • The total fiscal year 2016 military construction (MILCON) budget request is $8.4 billion.
  • The Army's portion of the request is $1.6 billion, representing 1.3% of the total Army budget.
  • The Army's $1.6 billion request is a 33% reduction from fiscal year 2014 and a 55% reduction from fiscal year 2013.
  • The Army's request includes $743 million for Military Construction, $197 million for Army National Guard, $114 million for Army Reserve, $493 million for Family Housing, and $30 million for Base Closure Accounts.
  • The Army reports that its current facility capacity is 18% greater than required for its 490,000 active-duty force.
  • Army leadership requested a new round of Base Realignment and Closure (BRAC) in 2017 to consolidate infrastructure.
  • The subcommittee noted a 67% increase for Air Force MILCON and a 59% increase for Navy MILCON compared to the previous year.
  • Budget Control Act (BCA) spending caps were identified as a primary challenge for future funding sustainability.

Why It Matters

The hearing outlines the funding priorities for military infrastructure, including barracks, training centers, and child care facilities, which directly impacts the living and working conditions of service members and their families.

Frequently Asked Questions

What is the MILCON budget used for?
It funds military infrastructure including barracks, physical fitness centers, child care centers, training facilities, and maintenance buildings.
Why is the Army asking for a new BRAC round?
Army leadership states that their current facility capacity exceeds the needs of the current force size and that a new process would help reduce costs and consolidate infrastructure.

News Coverage

No news coverage found yet. Articles are indexed twice daily.

Lobbying Activity

WHEAT SHROYER GOVERNMENT RELATIONS LLC

on behalf of AMERICAN ASSOCIATION OF NURSE ANESTHETISTS

VAN SCOYOC ASSOCIATES

on behalf of EJ WATER COOPERATIVE, INC.

Sponsors

Discoveries

Patterns POLISCOPE noticed across the record. These are observations to investigate, not conclusions.

policy shift90% confidence

Infrastructure Right-Sizing

The Army explicitly stated that its facility capacity is 18% higher than current force requirements, signaling a push for consolidation via a new BRAC round.

Connected Entities

personDavid D. HalversonLieutenant General, Assistant Chief of Staff for Installation ManagementMap →
personJon TesterRanking Member of the Senate Appropriations SubcommitteeMap →
personMark KirkChairman of the Senate Appropriations SubcommitteeMap →

Sources

Open source document

www.govinfo.gov

Analysis Score

0–100
  • Significance80
    How much this matters to a regular citizen
  • Controversy40
    Intensity of disagreement among stakeholders
  • Entertainment10
    Compellingness for a non-policy-wonk reader
  • Buzz20
    Current news / social attention level

Publisher tools

Share or embed this record

POLISCOPE publisher tools

Share or embed this record