POLISCOPE
Back to feed
FEDERALhearing transcript
High Impact

Congressional Hearing on Self-Driving Vehicle Legislation

Original title: SELF-DRIVING VEHICLE LEGISLATION

January 1, 2018

Track this bill to get notified when it advances a stage. One tap to stop, anytime.

The Frame

What this does

The hearing laid the groundwork for federal policy on self-driving cars, specifically focusing on how the National Highway Traffic Safety Administration () regulates vehicle safety, cybersecurity, and accessibility for seniors and people with disabilities.

Who is mentioned in the record

Potentially affected actors named in the source documents. Mention is not a position.

Automobile Manufacturers

These companies are subject to new federal safety and cybersecurity regulations for autonomous vehicle development.

Consumers

Consumers are affected by changes to vehicle safety standards and the potential deployment of autonomous technology on public roads.

People with disabilities

Proposed advisory councils are intended to address the mobility needs of this group regarding automated vehicle access.

What changed

Last recorded activity January 1, 2018.

What's next

Next step not available in the current record.

Summary

This document is a transcript of a 2017 House subcommittee hearing regarding the development and regulation of autonomous vehicles. It includes testimony from industry leaders, consumer advocates, and legal experts, alongside several legislative s aimed at updating federal oversight.

Key Facts

  • The hearing was held on June 27, 2017, by the Subcommittee on Digital Commerce and Consumer Protection.
  • The committee reviewed multiple legislative discussion drafts, including the LEAD'R Act and the Practical Automated Vehicle Exemptions Act.
  • Proposed legislation focuses on expanding NHTSA's authority to grant exemptions for autonomous vehicle testing.
  • Discussion drafts include provisions for a Disability Mobility Advisory Council and an advisory council for underserved populations and senior citizens.
  • One draft specifically addresses cybersecurity requirements for automated driving systems.
  • The hearing included testimony from representatives of the automotive industry, the U.S. Chamber of Commerce, and consumer advocacy groups.

Frequently Asked Questions

What is the purpose of these legislative drafts?
The drafts aim to update federal regulations to allow for the testing and deployment of self-driving vehicles while ensuring safety and cybersecurity.
How do these proposals affect people with disabilities?
The drafts include the creation of a Disability Mobility Advisory Council to ensure that autonomous vehicle development considers the needs of people with disabilities and senior citizens.

Why It Matters

The hearing laid the groundwork for federal policy on self-driving cars, specifically focusing on how the National Highway Traffic Safety Administration () regulates vehicle safety, cybersecurity, and accessibility for seniors and people with disabilities.

News Coverage

No news coverage found yet. Articles are indexed twice daily.

Lobbying Activity

CHAN LIEU

on behalf of SELF-DRIVING COALITION FOR SAFER STREETS

Senate LDAView filing →

Sponsors

Discoveries

Patterns POLISCOPE noticed across the record. These are observations to investigate, not conclusions.

policy shift90% confidence

Focus on Accessibility

The inclusion of specific advisory councils for seniors and people with disabilities indicates an early legislative focus on inclusive mobility in autonomous vehicle policy.

Connected Entities

personRobert E. LattaChairman of the Subcommittee on Digital Commerce and Consumer ProtectionMap →
personJanice D. SchakowskyRanking Member of the SubcommitteeMap →
personDavid L. StricklandCounsel for the Self-Driving Coalition for Safer StreetsMap →
personMitch BainwolCEO of the Alliance of Automobile ManufacturersMap →
organizationNational Highway Traffic Safety AdministrationThe federal agency responsible for vehicle safety standardsMap →

Sources

Open source document

www.govinfo.gov

Analysis Score

0–100
  • Significance85
    How much this matters to a regular citizen
  • Controversy40
    Intensity of disagreement among stakeholders
  • Entertainment10
    Compellingness for a non-policy-wonk reader
  • Buzz20
    Current news / social attention level

Publisher tools

Share or embed this record

POLISCOPE publisher tools

Share or embed this record