POLISCOPE
Back to feed
FEDERALcongressional record
High Impact

Proposed Resolution for Transparency in Congressional Settlement Payments

Original title: RAISING A QUESTION OF THE PRIVILEGES OF THE HOUSE

June 30, 2026

Track this bill to get notified when it advances a stage. One tap to stop, anytime.

The Frame

What this does

This resolution would force the public disclosure of how much taxpayer money has been used to settle claims against Members of Congress and staff, potentially revealing whether current reporting laws have loopholes that allow such payments to remain hidden.

Who is mentioned in the record

Potentially affected actors named in the source documents. Mention is not a position.

Members of Congress

They would be subject to public disclosure of their names and settlement amounts if they were the subject of investigations involving sexual harassment or abuse.

House of Representatives employees

Their settlement data would be included in aggregate reporting requirements regarding workplace misconduct.

Committee on Ethics

They are mandated to compile and publish the required settlement data within 60 days.

Office of Congressional Workplace Rights

They are mandated to compile and publish the required settlement data within 60 days.

What changed

Last recorded activity June 30, 2026.

What's next

Next step not available in the current record.

Summary

Representative Thomas Massie has introduced a resolution requiring the House Committee on Ethics and the Office of Congressional Workplace Rights to publicly disclose details regarding taxpayer-funded settlements. The resolution seeks to identify payments made in cases involving sexual harassment or abuse by Members of Congress and staff, as well as aggregate data on other types of settlements.

Key Facts

You don't have to trust us. Each fact below is taken straight from the official document - click any one to see the exact passage, highlighted in the original.

Why It Matters

This resolution would force the public disclosure of how much taxpayer money has been used to settle claims against Members of Congress and staff, potentially revealing whether current reporting laws have loopholes that allow such payments to remain hidden.

Frequently Asked Questions

What information would this resolution make public?
It would require the disclosure of names of Members of Congress involved in sexual harassment settlements paid with taxpayer funds, the specific dollar amounts of those settlements, and aggregate data on other types of workplace settlements.
Why does the sponsor believe this is necessary?
Representative Massie argues that current reporting requirements under the 2018 amendments to the Congressional Accountability Act may contain loopholes that prevent the public from knowing if Members are paying back taxpayer funds for settlements involving staff.
Does this resolution cover all House employees?
Yes, it requires reporting on settlements involving both Members of Congress and House employees, categorized by whether the conduct involved sexual harassment or other types of misconduct.

News Coverage

No news coverage found yet. Articles are indexed twice daily.

Sponsors

Discoveries

Patterns POLISCOPE noticed across the record. These are observations to investigate, not conclusions.

policy shift90% confidence

Transparency Gap Identification

The sponsor identifies a potential failure in the 2018 amendments to the Congressional Accountability Act, suggesting that current reporting mechanisms may be insufficient to track settlements paid by Members for staff-related claims.

Connected Entities

personThomas MassieRepresentative from Kentucky who introduced the resolution.Map →
organizationCommittee on EthicsHouse committee tasked with reviewing conduct and investigations.Map →
organizationGovernment Publishing OfficePublisher of the Congressional Record.Map →
organizationOffice of Congressional Workplace RightsOffice responsible for administering workplace claims and settlements.Map →

Sources

Open source document

www.govinfo.gov

Analysis Score

0–100
  • Significance85
    How much this matters to a regular citizen
  • Controversy75
    Intensity of disagreement among stakeholders
  • Entertainment40
    Compellingness for a non-policy-wonk reader
  • Buzz60
    Current news / social attention level

Publisher tools

Share or embed this record

POLISCOPE publisher tools

Share or embed this record