Part ofbanking regulation →

FEDERALhearing transcript

High Impact

Congressional Hearing on Wells Fargo Consumer Abuses

Original title: HOLDING MEGABANKS ACCOUNTABLE: AN EXAMINATION OF WELLS FARGO'S PATTERN OF CONSUMER ABUSES

January 1, 2019

banking regulation consumer protection Wells Fargo corporate accountability financial services

Track this bill to get notified when it advances a stage. One tap to stop, anytime.

The Frame

What this does

This hearing served as a formal oversight action by Congress to investigate systemic consumer protection failures at a major financial institution, which previously resulted in a $185 million fine for unauthorized account creation.

Who is mentioned in the record

Potentially affected actors named in the source documents. Mention is not a position.

Wells Fargo customers

Customers were subject to unauthorized account creation and potential financial losses.

Military servicemembers

Servicemembers were subject to illegal fees, eviction proceedings, and vehicle repossessions.

Timothy J. Sloan

As CEO, he was required to testify before the committee regarding the bank's operations.

What changed

Last recorded activity January 1, 2019.

What's next

Next step not available in the current record.

Summary

The House Committee on Financial Services held a hearing on March 12, 2019, to examine Wells Fargo's history of consumer abuses. The committee questioned then-CEO Timothy J. Sloan regarding the bank's past practices, including the unauthorized opening of millions of customer accounts and illegal actions against military servicemembers.

Key Facts

The House Committee on Financial Services held a hearing on March 12, 2019, to investigate Wells Fargo's consumer practices.
Between 2011 and 2016, Wells Fargo opened millions of unauthorized customer accounts.
In September 2016, the CFPB, OCC, and Los Angeles City Attorney fined Wells Fargo $185 million for unauthorized account creation.
Between 2006 and 2016, Wells Fargo was cited for charging illegal fees to military servicemembers.
Between 2006 and 2016, Wells Fargo failed to disclose the active-duty status of military members during eviction proceedings.
Between 2006 and 2016, Wells Fargo was cited for the unlawful repossession of vehicles owned by military servicemembers.

Frequently Asked Questions

Why was Wells Fargo being investigated by Congress?

The committee investigated the bank for a pattern of consumer abuses, specifically the unauthorized opening of millions of accounts and illegal treatment of military servicemembers.

What was the result of the 2016 regulatory action against Wells Fargo?

Regulators, including the CFPB and OCC, imposed a collective $185 million fine on the bank.

Why It Matters

News Coverage

No news coverage found yet. Articles are indexed twice daily.

Discoveries

Patterns POLISCOPE noticed across the record. These are observations to investigate, not conclusions.

policy shift90% confidence

Focus on Military Consumer Protections

The hearing highlighted a specific pattern of abuse targeting military servicemembers, indicating a focus on the Servicemembers Civil Relief Act compliance.

Wells Fargo & Company

Connected Entities

organizationConsumer Financial Protection Bureau“Regulatory body that participated in the 2016 fine against Wells Fargo.”Map →

organizationOffice of the Comptroller of the Currency“Regulatory body that participated in the 2016 fine against Wells Fargo.”Map →

personTimothy J. Sloan“President and CEO of Wells Fargo & Company at the time of the hearing.”Map →

personMaxine Waters“Chairwoman of the House Committee on Financial Services.”Map →

organizationWells Fargo & Company“The financial institution under investigation for consumer abuses.”Map →

Sources

Open source document

www.govinfo.gov

Analysis Score

0–100

Significance85
How much this matters to a regular citizen
Controversy80
Intensity of disagreement among stakeholders
Entertainment60
Compellingness for a non-policy-wonk reader
Buzz40
Current news / social attention level

Publisher tools