POLISCOPE
Back to feed
FEDERALhearing transcript

Senate Confirmation Hearing for Federal Agency Nominees

Original title: NOMINATION TO THE NATIONAL AERONAUTICS AND SPACE ADMINISTRATION, THE CONSUMER PRODUCT SAFETY COMMISSION, AND THE U.S. DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE

January 1, 2019

Track this bill to get notified when it advances a stage. One tap to stop, anytime.

The Frame

What this does

This hearing represents the formal vetting process for leadership roles that oversee national space policy, consumer product safety standards, and international trade analysis.

Who is mentioned in the record

Potentially affected actors named in the source documents. Mention is not a position.

James Bridenstine

He is the subject of a nomination review for the position of NASA Administrator.

Senate Committee on Commerce, Science, and Transportation

The committee is responsible for vetting and reporting on the suitability of the nominees.

What changed

Last recorded activity January 1, 2019.

What's next

Next step not available in the current record.

Summary

The Senate Committee on Commerce, Science, and Transportation held a hearing on November 1, 2017, to review the nominations of four individuals for key positions at NASA, the Consumer Product Safety Commission, and the Department of Commerce.

Key Facts

  • The hearing took place on November 1, 2017, before the Senate Committee on Commerce, Science, and Transportation.
  • James Bridenstine was reviewed as the nominee for Administrator of the National Aeronautics and Space Administration (NASA).
  • Dana Baiocco was reviewed as the nominee for Commissioner of the Consumer Product Safety Commission.
  • Neil Jacobs, Jr., Ph.D., was reviewed as the nominee for Assistant Secretary of Commerce for Environmental Observation and Prediction.
  • Nazakhtar Nikakhtar was reviewed as the nominee for Assistant Secretary for Industry and Analysis at the U.S. Department of Commerce.
  • The committee received a letter of opposition regarding the Bridenstine nomination from Senator Patty Murray.
  • The committee received a joint letter of opposition regarding the Bridenstine nomination from several environmental and advocacy groups, including the League of Conservation Voters and the Sierra Club.
  • The record includes written responses to questions submitted to James Bridenstine by eight different U.S. Senators.

Frequently Asked Questions

What is the purpose of this document?
It is the official transcript and record of a Senate confirmation hearing for four executive branch s.
Who were the nominees being considered?
James Bridenstine (NASA), Dana Baiocco (Consumer Product Safety Commission), Neil Jacobs, Jr. (Department of Commerce), and Nazakhtar Nikakhtar (Department of Commerce).

Why It Matters

This hearing represents the formal vetting process for leadership roles that oversee national space policy, consumer product safety standards, and international trade analysis.

News Coverage

No news coverage found yet. Articles are indexed twice daily.

Sponsors

Show 1 more sponsor

Discoveries

Patterns POLISCOPE noticed across the record. These are observations to investigate, not conclusions.

policy shift90% confidence

Opposition to NASA Nominee

The record highlights a coordinated effort by environmental and advocacy groups to oppose the nomination of James Bridenstine, reflecting a focus on his past statements regarding climate and social issues.

Connected Entities

personJames BridenstineNominee for Administrator of NASAMap →
personDana BaioccoNominee for Commissioner of the Consumer Product Safety CommissionMap →
personBill NelsonRanking Member of the Senate Committee on Commerce, Science, and TransportationMap →
personJohn ThuneChairman of the Senate Committee on Commerce, Science, and TransportationMap →
personNazakhtar NikakhtarNominee for Assistant Secretary, Industry and Analysis, U.S. Department of CommeMap →
personNeil Jacobs, Jr.Nominee for Assistant Secretary of Commerce, Environmental Observation and PrediMap →

Sources

Open source document

www.govinfo.gov

Analysis Score

0–100
  • Significance65
    How much this matters to a regular citizen
  • Controversy55
    Intensity of disagreement among stakeholders
  • Entertainment20
    Compellingness for a non-policy-wonk reader
  • Buzz15
    Current news / social attention level

Publisher tools

Share or embed this record

POLISCOPE publisher tools

Share or embed this record