POLISCOPE
Back to feed
HR3492FEDERALin_committee
High Impact

Protect Children’s Innocence Act of 2025

Original title: Protect Children’s Innocence Act

May 19, 2025

Track this bill to get notified when it advances a stage. One tap to stop, anytime.

Where This Stands

Introduced
Committee
Floor Vote
Passed
Signed

Currently in_committee. The next step in the legislative lifecycle is Floor Vote.

Last action
Received in the Senate and Read twice and referred to the Committee on the Judiciary.Dec 18, 2025

Version history

Only one version on file - nothing to compare yet. As later stages (committee substitute, engrossed, enrolled) are captured, the redline appears here.

View official text →

The Frame

What this does

If passed, this bill would create a federal criminal prohibition on gender-affirming medical procedures for minors, overriding state-level regulations and establishing a 10-year maximum prison sentence for providers.

Who is mentioned in the record

Potentially affected actors named in the source documents. Mention is not a position.

Medical practitioners

Providers face potential federal criminal prosecution and imprisonment for performing specific procedures on minors.

Minors

The bill restricts the availability of specific medical procedures for minors while granting them immunity from prosecution.

What changed

Current stage: in_committee.

What's next

Floor Vote.

Summary

This bill proposes to make it a federal crime to perform certain surgical or chemical procedures on minors for the purpose of gender transition. It establishes criminal penalties, including fines and up to 10 years in prison, for those who perform these procedures, with specific exceptions for medical necessity.

Key Facts

  • Establishes federal criminal penalties of fines and up to 10 years in prison for performing genital or bodily mutilation or chemical castration on a minor.
  • Defines 'genital or bodily mutilation' to include a wide range of surgeries, including mastectomies, hysterectomies, and various reconstructive procedures when performed for gender transition purposes.
  • Defines 'chemical castration' as the administration of medications to alter sex characteristics.
  • Applies to conduct involving interstate commerce, federal jurisdiction, or use of federal facilities.
  • Prohibits the use of religion, custom, or tradition as a legal defense for female genital mutilation.
  • Explicitly prohibits the arrest or prosecution of the minor who is the subject of the procedure.
  • Provides an exception for procedures necessary to the health of a minor, provided they are performed by a licensed medical practitioner.
  • Specifies that 'health of a minor' does not include mental health disorders.
  • Provides exemptions for individuals with specific medical conditions, including intersex traits, infections, or physical disorders requiring intervention to prevent imminent danger to major bodily functions.
  • Includes an exemption for procedures performed on individuals experiencing complications from previous gender transition procedures.

Frequently Asked Questions

Does this bill punish the minor receiving the procedure?
No. The bill explicitly states that no person who is chemically castrated or on whom genital or bodily mutilation is performed may be arrested or prosecuted.
Are there any medical exceptions?
Yes. Procedures are permitted if they are necessary to the health of the minor (excluding mental health) or if the individual has specific physical or genetic conditions defined in the bill.
What happens if a doctor performs these procedures?
If the procedure does not meet the specific exceptions, the provider faces a fine and up to 10 years in federal prison.

Why It Matters

If passed, this bill would create a federal criminal prohibition on gender-affirming medical procedures for minors, overriding state-level regulations and establishing a 10-year maximum prison sentence for providers.

News Coverage

No news coverage found yet. Articles are indexed twice daily.

Voting Record

Sponsors

Discoveries

Patterns POLISCOPE noticed across the record. These are observations to investigate, not conclusions.

policy shift90% confidence

Federalization of Medical Standards

The bill attempts to use the Commerce Clause to establish a national standard for medical procedures that are currently regulated at the state level.

Connected Entities

personMs. Greene of GeorgiaPrimary sponsor of the bill in the House of Representatives.Map →
organizationCommittee on the JudiciaryThe committee to which the bill was referred for review.Map →

Sources

Open source document

www.congress.gov

Analysis Score

0–100
  • Significance90
    How much this matters to a regular citizen
  • Controversy95
    Intensity of disagreement among stakeholders
  • Entertainment40
    Compellingness for a non-policy-wonk reader
  • Buzz85
    Current news / social attention level

Publisher tools

Share or embed this record

POLISCOPE publisher tools

Share or embed this record