POLISCOPE
Back to feed
HR8592FEDERALin_committee
High Impact

No WAR Act (H.R. 8592)

Original title: No WAR Act

April 30, 2026

Track this bill to get notified when it advances a stage. One tap to stop, anytime.

Where This Stands

Introduced
Committee
Floor Vote
Passed
Signed

Currently in_committee. The next step in the legislative lifecycle is Floor Vote.

Last action
Referred to the Committee on Rules, and in addition to the Committee on the Budget, for a period to be subsequently determined by the Speaker, in each case for consideration of such provisions as fall within the jurisdiction of the committee concerned.Apr 30, 2026

Version history

Only one version on file - nothing to compare yet. As later stages (committee substitute, engrossed, enrolled) are captured, the redline appears here.

View official text →

The Frame

What this does

This bill would restrict the legislative tools available to Congress for funding military operations against Iran, requiring a separate, explicit authorization before budget can be used for such purposes.

Who is mentioned in the record

Potentially affected actors named in the source documents. Mention is not a position.

Department of Defense

The agency would be restricted from receiving funding for specific military operations against Iran through the reconciliation process.

Members of Congress

Legislators would face a new procedural hurdle (a point of order) when attempting to include military funding in reconciliation packages.

What changed

Current stage: in_committee.

What's next

Floor Vote.

Summary

The No WAR Act proposes a new rule in Congress that would block the use of '' bills to fund military actions against Iran. Under this bill, Congress could not use this specific fast-track budget process to pay for hostilities against Iran unless a formal declaration of war or specific authorization for military force has already been passed.

Key Facts

  • The bill creates a 'point of order' in both the House and Senate against reconciliation measures that provide funding for military hostilities against Iran.
  • The restriction applies to any reconciliation bill, resolution, or amendment that provides budget authority for military action.
  • Hostilities are defined to include offensive military operations, strikes, covert actions, or sustained engagements against Iranian military forces, territory, or government institutions.
  • The restriction covers hostilities conducted by 'proxy forces,' defined as foreign military or irregular forces operating at the direction or with the support of the U.S.
  • The restriction is waived only if Congress has passed a declaration of war or a specific authorization for the use of military force (AUMF).
  • The bill amends Section 310 of the Congressional Budget and Impoundment Control Act of 1974.
  • The bill amends Section 904 of the Congressional Budget and Impoundment Control Act of 1974 to incorporate the new point of order.
  • The bill was introduced on April 30, 2026, in the 119th Congress.

Frequently Asked Questions

What is a 'reconciliation' bill?
is a special legislative process that allows certain budget-related bills to pass the Senate with a simple majority, bypassing the typical 60-vote threshold for filibusters.
Does this bill stop all military action against Iran?
No. It prevents the use of the fast-track budget process to fund such actions unless Congress has already specifically authorized the military force.
What counts as a 'proxy force' under this bill?
Any foreign military, paramilitary, or irregular force that operates at the direction of the U.S. or receives material support from the U.S.

Why It Matters

This bill would restrict the legislative tools available to Congress for funding military operations against Iran, requiring a separate, explicit authorization before budget can be used for such purposes.

News Coverage

No news coverage found yet. Articles are indexed twice daily.

Lobbying Activity

POWERS PYLES SUTTER & VERVILLE, P.C.

on behalf of UPPER MOHAWK, INC.

MAVERICK HILL PARTNERS

on behalf of SYSTECON NORTH AMERICA

C. BAKER CONSULTING, INC.

on behalf of SAAB, INCORPORATED FKA SAAB TRAINING AND SIMULATION

MAVERICK HILL PARTNERS

on behalf of DAYTON T. BROWN

Sponsors

Discoveries

Patterns POLISCOPE noticed across the record. These are observations to investigate, not conclusions.

policy shift90% confidence

Procedural constraint on war funding

The bill attempts to use budget procedural rules to enforce war powers limitations, a strategy to bypass the need for a standalone war authorization vote.

Connected Entities

personMr. BoyleRepresentative from Pennsylvania who co-sponsored the bill.Map →
personMs. HoyleRepresentative from Oregon who introduced the bill.Map →
otherCongressional Budget and Impoundment Control Act of 1974The existing law that this bill seeks to amend.Map →
locationIranThe nation targeted by the proposed military funding restrictions.Map →

Analysis Score

0–100
  • Significance75
    How much this matters to a regular citizen
  • Controversy65
    Intensity of disagreement among stakeholders
  • Entertainment20
    Compellingness for a non-policy-wonk reader
  • Buzz30
    Current news / social attention level

Publisher tools

Share or embed this record

POLISCOPE publisher tools

Share or embed this record