POLISCOPE
Back to feed
Part ofemergency powers →
FEDERALhearing transcript
High Impact

Hearing on Reforming Presidential Emergency Powers

Original title: EXAMINING POTENTIAL REFORMS OF EMERGENCY POWERS

January 1, 2022

emergency powersconstitutional lawcongressional oversightnational securitycivil liberties

Track this bill to get notified when it advances a stage. One tap to stop, anytime.

The Frame

What this does

This hearing explores potential changes to the , which could alter the scope of presidential authority and the extent of congressional oversight during future national crises.

Who is mentioned in the record

Potentially affected actors named in the source documents. Mention is not a position.

U.S. Congress

Legislative authority and oversight mechanisms regarding presidential emergency declarations are the subject of the proposed reforms.

Executive Branch

The scope of presidential authority to act during declared national emergencies may be restricted or redefined by potential legislation.

What changed

Last recorded activity January 1, 2022.

What's next

Next step not available in the current record.

Summary

The House Subcommittee on the Constitution, Civil Rights, and Civil Liberties held a hearing on May 17, 2022, to discuss potential legislative reforms to federal emergency powers. The session featured testimony from legal experts and policy advocates regarding the balance of power between the executive and legislative branches during national emergencies.

Key Facts

  • The hearing took place on May 17, 2022, in the Rayburn House Office Building.
  • The Subcommittee examined reforms to the National Emergencies Act.
  • Four expert witnesses provided testimony on the legal and constitutional implications of emergency powers.
  • A letter signed by seven organizations supporting reform of the National Emergencies Act was submitted for the record.
  • A paper titled 'Up Against the Wall: Congressional Retention of the Spending Power in Times of Emergency' was submitted for the record.

Frequently Asked Questions

What is the purpose of this hearing?
The hearing was held to examine how federal emergency powers are currently used and to discuss potential legislative reforms to improve congressional oversight.
Who testified at the hearing?
Witnesses included Elizabeth Goitein (Brennan Center for Justice), Soren Dayton (Protect Democracy), GianCarlo Canaparo (The Heritage Foundation), and Joel W. McClearly (Four Seasons Ventures LLC).

Why It Matters

This hearing explores potential changes to the , which could alter the scope of presidential authority and the extent of congressional oversight during future national crises.

News Coverage

No news coverage found yet. Articles are indexed twice daily.

Sponsors

Show 1 more sponsor

Discoveries

Patterns POLISCOPE noticed across the record. These are observations to investigate, not conclusions.

policy shift80% confidence

Bipartisan Interest in Emergency Power Reform

The hearing included testimony from a diverse range of organizations, suggesting a cross-ideological interest in re-evaluating the National Emergencies Act.

Brennan Center for JusticeThe Heritage Foundation

Connected Entities

personSteve Cohen“Chair of the Subcommittee on the Constitution, Civil Rights, and Civil Liberties”Map →
personElizabeth Goitein“Witness, Brennan Center for Justice”Map →
personJoel W. McClearly“Witness, Four Seasons Ventures LLC”Map →
personMike Johnson“Ranking Member of the Subcommittee”Map →
personGianCarlo Canaparo“Witness, The Heritage Foundation”Map →
personSoren Dayton“Witness, Protect Democracy”Map →

Sources

Open source document

www.govinfo.gov

Analysis Score

0–100
  • Significance75
    How much this matters to a regular citizen
  • Controversy40
    Intensity of disagreement among stakeholders
  • Entertainment10
    Compellingness for a non-policy-wonk reader
  • Buzz20
    Current news / social attention level

Publisher tools

Share or embed this record

POLISCOPE publisher tools

Share or embed this record