Lobbying Activity: Teamsters Joint Council 25 Opposition to Sugar Tax
July 1, 2015
Track this bill to get notified when it advances a stage. One tap to stop, anytime.
The Frame
This document records the formal opposition of a labor organization to a proposed local tax on , which would have impacted the cost of goods for consumers and the operations of beverage distributors in Chicago.
Potentially affected actors named in the source documents. Mention is not a position.
Teamsters Joint Council 25
The organization actively sought to influence legislative outcomes regarding beverage taxation.
Chicago City Council
The body was the target of lobbying efforts regarding potential tax legislation.
Last recorded activity July 1, 2015.
Next step not available in the current record.
Summary
Key Facts
- Michael P. Ciaccio acted as the lobbyist for Teamsters Joint Council 25.
- The lobbying effort was directed at the Chicago City Council and Aldermen.
- The stated goal of the lobbying was to oppose an increase in the tax on sugar-sweetened beverages.
- The lobbying period covered July 1, 2015, through September 30, 2015.
Frequently Asked Questions
What was the purpose of this lobbying activity?
Who was the client represented in this filing?
Why It Matters
This document records the formal opposition of a labor organization to a proposed local tax on , which would have impacted the cost of goods for consumers and the operations of beverage distributors in Chicago.
News Coverage
Lobbying Activity
MICHAEL P CIACCIO
on behalf of TEAMSTERS JOINT COUNCIL 25
MICHAEL P CIACCIO
on behalf of TEAMSTERS JOINT COUNCIL 25
Sponsors
Discoveries
Patterns POLISCOPE noticed across the record. These are observations to investigate, not conclusions.
Historical Beverage Tax Opposition
This document confirms that labor organizations were actively lobbying against sugar-sweetened beverage taxes in Chicago as early as 2015.
Connected Entities
Sources
data.cityofchicago.org
Analysis Score
0–100- Significance40How much this matters to a regular citizen
- Controversy50Intensity of disagreement among stakeholders
- Entertainment10Compellingness for a non-policy-wonk reader
- Buzz15Current news / social attention level
Publisher tools