POLISCOPE
Back to feed
HR8283FEDERALin_committee
High Impact

Deterring American AI Model Theft Act of 2026

April 15, 2026

Track this bill to get notified when it advances a stage. One tap to stop, anytime.

Where This Stands

Introduced
Committee
Floor Vote
Passed
Signed

Currently in_committee. The next step in the legislative lifecycle is Floor Vote.

Last action
Ordered to be Reported (Amended) by the Yeas and Nays: 43 - 0.Apr 22, 2026

Version history

Only one version on file - nothing to compare yet. As later stages (committee substitute, engrossed, enrolled) are captured, the redline appears here.

View official text →

The Frame

What this does

The bill creates a federal framework to identify and potentially penalize foreign entities that bypass security controls to steal proprietary AI technology, impacting how U.S. AI companies manage access to their models.

Who is mentioned in the record

Potentially affected actors named in the source documents. Mention is not a position.

U.S. AI Companies

These companies are the owners of closed-source models and would be the primary entities protected by the identification and deterrence of extraction attacks.

Foreign entities in countries of concern

These entities face potential identification and penalties if they are found to be conducting unauthorized model extraction attacks.

What changed

Current stage: in_committee.

What's next

Floor Vote.

Summary

This bill aims to protect American-owned, closed-source artificial intelligence models from unauthorized data extraction by foreign adversaries. It establishes legal definitions for 's' and 'entities of concern' to help the U.S. government identify and deter the theft of proprietary AI technical features.

Key Facts

  • Defines 'closed-source AI models' as proprietary models with restricted access, governed by terms of service, and not publicly available.
  • Defines 'model extraction attacks' as unauthorized querying to replicate or train other AI models by circumventing access controls or violating terms of service.
  • Identifies 'countries of concern' as China (including Hong Kong and Macau), Russia, and other nations designated by the Secretary of State.
  • Defines 'entities of concern' as foreign persons or entities headquartered in countries of concern or those conducting unauthorized model extraction.
  • Defines 'fraudulent account network providers' as foreign entities that knowingly provide access to restricted AI models for entities of concern.
  • Excludes from the definition of 'fraudulent account network provider' entities that provide internet access for freedom of expression purposes.
  • Allows the purpose of a model extraction attack to be inferred from query volume, patterns, coordination, and correlation with other AI development timelines.
  • States that authorized model training consistent with terms of service is a legitimate research method and distinct from extraction attacks.
  • Designates the House Committee on Foreign Affairs and the Senate Committee on Banking, Housing, and Urban Affairs as the appropriate congressional committees for oversight.

Frequently Asked Questions

Does this bill stop me from using AI for research?
No. The bill explicitly states that authorized model training that follows the owner's terms of service is a legitimate research method and is not considered a .
What counts as a 'model extraction attack'?
It is the unauthorized extraction of an AI model's capabilities to replicate or improve another model by bypassing security controls, using fraudulent credentials, or violating the owner's terms of service.

Why It Matters

The bill creates a federal framework to identify and potentially penalize foreign entities that bypass security controls to steal proprietary AI technology, impacting how U.S. AI companies manage access to their models.

News Coverage

No news coverage found yet. Articles are indexed twice daily.

Sponsors

Discoveries

Patterns POLISCOPE noticed across the record. These are observations to investigate, not conclusions.

policy shift90% confidence

Inference-based Enforcement

The bill allows the government to infer malicious intent based on the 'totality of circumstances' of query patterns, rather than requiring direct evidence of intent.

Connected Entities

locationRussian FederationExplicitly named as a country of concern.Map →
personMr. HuizengaPrimary sponsor of the bill in the House of Representatives.Map →
personMr. MoolenaarCo-sponsor of the bill.Map →
locationPeople's Republic of ChinaExplicitly named as a country of concern.Map →

Analysis Score

0–100
  • Significance85
    How much this matters to a regular citizen
  • Controversy40
    Intensity of disagreement among stakeholders
  • Entertainment10
    Compellingness for a non-policy-wonk reader
  • Buzz60
    Current news / social attention level

Publisher tools

Share or embed this record

POLISCOPE publisher tools

Share or embed this record