POLISCOPE
Back to feed
S636FEDERALin_committee
High Impact

Public Safety Employer-Employee Cooperation Act

February 19, 2025

Track this bill to get notified when it advances a stage. One tap to stop, anytime.

Where This Stands

Introduced
Committee
Floor Vote
Passed
Signed

Currently in_committee. The next step in the legislative lifecycle is Floor Vote.

Last action
Read twice and referred to the Committee on Health, Education, Labor, and Pensions.Feb 19, 2025

Version history

Only one version on file - nothing to compare yet. As later stages (committee substitute, engrossed, enrolled) are captured, the redline appears here.

View official text →

The Frame

What this does

If passed, this bill would mandate that state and local governments allow public safety employees to negotiate their pay, hours, and working conditions, potentially overriding state laws that currently restrict these rights.

Who is mentioned in the record

Potentially affected actors named in the source documents. Mention is not a position.

Public safety officers

They would gain federal protections to engage in collective bargaining with their employers.

State and local governments

They would be required to recognize and negotiate with labor organizations representing public safety officers if they do not already meet federal standards.

What changed

Current stage: in_committee.

What's next

Floor Vote.

Summary

This bill proposes a federal requirement for states and local governments to provide rights to public safety officers, including police, firefighters, and emergency medical personnel. It aims to standardize labor-management cooperation to improve emergency response and workplace stability.

Why It Matters

If passed, this bill would mandate that state and local governments allow public safety employees to negotiate their pay, hours, and working conditions, potentially overriding state laws that currently restrict these rights.

Key Facts

  • The bill mandates collective bargaining rights for public safety officers employed by states or local political subdivisions.
  • Public safety officers are defined as law enforcement officers, firefighters, and emergency medical services employees.
  • The bill excludes supervisory, management, and confidential employees from these collective bargaining protections.
  • States that already provide collective bargaining rights comparable to or greater than those in this Act are exempt from new requirements.
  • The Federal Labor Relations Authority is designated as the oversight body for the Act.
  • The bill defines 'public safety employers' as being engaged in interstate commerce, providing the constitutional basis for federal intervention.
  • The legislation encourages the use of conciliation, mediation, and arbitration to resolve labor disputes regarding pay, hours, and working conditions.

Frequently Asked Questions

Does this bill apply to all public employees?
No, it specifically applies to 'public safety officers,' which includes law enforcement, firefighters, and emergency medical services employees.
What if my state already has laws about public safety unions?
The bill states that if a state already provides rights comparable to or greater than those in this Act, those existing state laws will be respected.
Who is excluded from these bargaining rights?
Supervisory, management, and s are excluded from the definition of public safety officer for the purposes of this Act.

News Coverage

No news coverage found yet. Articles are indexed twice daily.

Sponsors

Discoveries

Patterns POLISCOPE noticed across the record. These are observations to investigate, not conclusions.

policy shift90% confidence

Federal Preemption of State Labor Law

The bill explicitly frames public safety labor relations as a matter of interstate commerce to justify federal intervention into state-level employment policy.

Connected Entities

personJohn HickenlooperU.S. Senator who introduced the bill.Map →
organizationFederal Labor Relations AuthorityDesignated as the 'Authority' responsible for overseeing the act.Map →
personMaggie HassanU.S. Senator who co-sponsored the bill.Map →

Analysis Score

0–100
  • Significance85
    How much this matters to a regular citizen
  • Controversy75
    Intensity of disagreement among stakeholders
  • Entertainment10
    Compellingness for a non-policy-wonk reader
  • Buzz40
    Current news / social attention level

Publisher tools

Share or embed this record

POLISCOPE publisher tools

Share or embed this record