FEDERALhearing transcript

Congressional Oversight Hearing on Presidential Mitigation Memorandum

Original title: THE IMPOSITION OF NEW REGULATIONS THROUGH THE PRESIDENT'S MEMORANDUM ON MITIGATION

January 1, 2016

environmental policy executive authority natural resources federal regulation mitigation

Track this bill to get notified when it advances a stage. One tap to stop, anytime.

The Frame

What this does

The hearing addresses how federal agencies implement environmental requirements for development projects, which affects the regulatory burden and compliance costs for private and public entities seeking federal project approval.

Who is mentioned in the record

Potentially affected actors named in the source documents. Mention is not a position.

Federal Agencies (Interior, Agriculture, EPA, etc.)

These agencies are required to develop and implement new, consistent standards for environmental mitigation.

Project Developers

Developers seeking federal project approval must comply with the new mitigation standards established by the agencies.

What changed

Last recorded activity January 1, 2016.

What's next

Next step not available in the current record.

Summary

The House Subcommittee on Oversight and Investigations held a hearing to examine a November 2015 Presidential Memorandum that directs federal agencies to standardize how they mitigate environmental impacts from development projects. Lawmakers questioned administration officials regarding the use of to establish these new regulatory approaches outside of the traditional legislative process.

Key Facts

The hearing took place on February 24, 2016, to review the Presidential Memorandum titled 'Mitigating Impacts on Natural Resources from Development and Encouraging Related Private Investment'.
The memorandum directs the Departments of Defense, Interior, Agriculture, the EPA, and the National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration to create a consistent approach for mitigating project impacts.
The subcommittee questioned whether the memorandum constitutes an overreach of executive authority by bypassing the legislative process.
Witnesses included representatives from the Council on Environmental Quality, the U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service, and the National Forest System.

Frequently Asked Questions

What is the purpose of the Presidential Memorandum discussed in the hearing?

It directs federal agencies to develop a clear and consistent approach to mitigate the environmental impacts of the projects they approve.

Which agencies are affected by this memorandum?

The Departments of Defense, Interior, Agriculture, the EPA, and the National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration.

Why It Matters

News Coverage

No news coverage found yet. Articles are indexed twice daily.

Discoveries

Patterns POLISCOPE noticed across the record. These are observations to investigate, not conclusions.

policy shift90% confidence

Standardization of Mitigation

The memorandum represents a shift toward cross-agency consistency in environmental mitigation requirements rather than agency-specific policies.

Council on Environmental Quality U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service

Connected Entities

organizationCommittee on Natural Resources“House committee overseeing the hearing”Map →

personDebbie Dingell“Ranking Democratic Member of the Subcommittee”Map →

personLouie Gohmert“Chairman of the Subcommittee on Oversight and Investigations”Map →

personMichael Bean“Principal Deputy Assistant Secretary, U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service”Map →

personChristy Goldfuss“Managing Director, Council on Environmental Quality”Map →

personBrian Ferebee“Associate Deputy Chief, National Forest System”Map →

Sources

Open source document

www.govinfo.gov

Analysis Score

0–100

Significance65
How much this matters to a regular citizen
Controversy60
Intensity of disagreement among stakeholders
Entertainment20
Compellingness for a non-policy-wonk reader
Buzz15
Current news / social attention level

Publisher tools