POLISCOPE
Back to feed
FEDERALhearing transcript

Congressional Hearing on U.S. Influence in the Pacific Islands

Original title: U.S. POLICY IN THE PACIFIC: THE STRUGGLE TO MAINTAIN INFLUENCE

January 1, 2016

Track this bill to get notified when it advances a stage. One tap to stop, anytime.

The Frame

What this does

The hearing addresses the U.S. strategic defense posture and diplomatic relationships in the Pacific, which directly impact military operations at sites like the Ronald Reagan Ballistic Missile Defense Test Site and the security of U.S. territories.

Who is mentioned in the record

Potentially affected actors named in the source documents. Mention is not a position.

U.S. Pacific Territories (Guam, American Samoa, Northern Mariana Islands)

These territories are geographically adjacent to the Pacific Island states and are part of the U.S. regional defense strategy.

Compact States (Palau, Marshall Islands, Micronesia)

These nations maintain specific military and diplomatic ties with the U.S. government.

What changed

Last recorded activity January 1, 2016.

What's next

Next step not available in the current record.

Summary

This document is a transcript from a 2016 House subcommittee hearing regarding U.S. strategic, economic, and security interests in the Pacific Island region. It highlights the historical and ongoing importance of relationships with Pacific nations, including those with Compacts of Free Association.

Key Facts

  • The hearing was held on June 23, 2016, by the Subcommittee on Asia and the Pacific.
  • The Pacific Island region consists of 14 sovereign states with a total population of approximately 9 million people.
  • The U.S. maintains Compacts of Free Association with Palau, the Marshall Islands, and the Federated States of Micronesia.
  • The Marshall Islands hosts the Ronald Reagan Ballistic Missile Defense Test Site.
  • U.S. strategic defense theory utilizes Pacific territories and compact states as a 'second island chain' defensive line.
  • The hearing record remained open for 5 calendar days following the session for additional submissions.

Why It Matters

The hearing addresses the U.S. strategic defense posture and diplomatic relationships in the Pacific, which directly impact military operations at sites like the Ronald Reagan Ballistic Missile Defense Test Site and the security of U.S. territories.

Frequently Asked Questions

What is a Compact of Free Association?
It is a specific diplomatic and military agreement between the United States and the nations of Palau, the Marshall Islands, and the Federated States of Micronesia.
Why does the U.S. focus on the Pacific Islands?
The region is considered vital for regional security, international organization participation, and the protection of U.S. territories like Guam and American Samoa.

News Coverage

No news coverage found yet. Articles are indexed twice daily.

Sponsors

Discoveries

Patterns POLISCOPE noticed across the record. These are observations to investigate, not conclusions.

policy shift90% confidence

Strategic Defense Continuity

The hearing emphasizes that U.S. defense strategy in the Pacific has remained consistent with post-WWII 'island chain' theories.

Connected Entities

locationFederated States of MicronesiaNation with a Compact of Free Association with the U.S.Map →
locationMarshall IslandsNation with a Compact of Free Association with the U.S.Map →
locationPalauNation with a Compact of Free Association with the U.S.Map →
locationRonald Reagan Ballistic Missile Defense Test SiteStrategic military facility located in the Marshall IslandsMap →
personMatthew J. MatthewsDeputy Assistant Secretary for Australia, New Zealand, and the Pacific IslandsMap →
personGloria SteeleSenior Deputy Assistant Administrator, Bureau for Asia, USAIDMap →
personMatt SalmonChairman of the Subcommittee on Asia and the PacificMap →

Sources

Open source document

www.govinfo.gov

Analysis Score

0–100
  • Significance65
    How much this matters to a regular citizen
  • Controversy15
    Intensity of disagreement among stakeholders
  • Entertainment5
    Compellingness for a non-policy-wonk reader
  • Buzz10
    Current news / social attention level

Publisher tools

Share or embed this record

POLISCOPE publisher tools

Share or embed this record