POLISCOPE
Back to feed
FEDERALhearing transcript

Senate Hearing: Examining Federal Agency Regulatory Guidance

Original title: EXAMINING THE USE OF AGENCY REGULATORY GUIDANCE, PART II

January 1, 2016

Track this bill to get notified when it advances a stage. One tap to stop, anytime.

The Frame

What this does

The hearing addresses the legal distinction between informal agency guidance and formal regulations, which determines whether federal agencies can impose new requirements on businesses and the public without following standard public notice and comment procedures.

Who is mentioned in the record

Potentially affected actors named in the source documents. Mention is not a position.

Small businesses

They are subject to federal requirements and rely on guidance to understand how to comply with regulations.

Federal agencies

They issue guidance documents to interpret and enforce federal statutes.

What changed

Last recorded activity January 1, 2016.

What's next

Next step not available in the current record.

Summary

This Senate subcommittee hearing examined how federal agencies use 'regulatory guidance' to interpret laws and regulations. Senators and witnesses discussed the difficulty of distinguishing between helpful clarifications and new, binding policies that bypass the formal rulemaking process.

Key Facts

  • The hearing was held on June 30, 2016, as the second part of an oversight series on agency regulatory guidance.
  • Regulatory guidance is defined as a tool for agencies to interpret statutes and regulations for the public.
  • Guidance documents are exempt from the Administrative Procedure Act (APA) rulemaking requirements, meaning they do not require the same public notice and comment process as formal regulations.
  • Guidance documents are not legally binding in the same way as formal regulations.
  • There is no central repository for federal guidance documents, making it difficult to track their total number or economic impact.
  • Concerns were raised that agencies may use guidance to advance new substantive policies rather than merely clarifying existing ones.
  • Guidance can be changed at the discretion of an agency without formal administrative procedures.

Frequently Asked Questions

What is regulatory guidance?
It is a document issued by a federal agency to explain or interpret existing laws and regulations to the public.
Why is there concern about guidance documents?
Critics argue that agencies sometimes use guidance to create new, binding policies that should have gone through the formal, public rulemaking process.
Are guidance documents legally binding?
No, guidance documents are not formal rules and cannot legally bind the public in the same way that a regulation under the Administrative Procedure Act can.

Why It Matters

The hearing addresses the legal distinction between informal agency guidance and formal regulations, which determines whether federal agencies can impose new requirements on businesses and the public without following standard public notice and comment procedures.

News Coverage

No news coverage found yet. Articles are indexed twice daily.

Sponsors

Show 1 more sponsor

Discoveries

Patterns POLISCOPE noticed across the record. These are observations to investigate, not conclusions.

policy shift90% confidence

Oversight of Informal Rulemaking

The hearing highlights a long-standing congressional effort to increase transparency in how agencies use informal guidance to bypass formal rulemaking.

Connected Entities

personPaul NoeWitness, Vice President at American Forest and Paper AssociationMap →
organizationSubcommittee on Regulatory Affairs and Federal ManagementOrganizing body of the hearingMap →
personAmit NarangWitness, Regulatory Policy Advocate at Public CitizenMap →
personHeidi HeitkampSubcommittee memberMap →
personClyde Wayne CrewsWitness, Vice President at Competitive Enterprise InstituteMap →
personJames LankfordChairman of the Subcommittee on Regulatory Affairs and Federal ManagementMap →
personJoni ErnstSubcommittee memberMap →

Sources

Open source document

www.govinfo.gov

Analysis Score

0–100
  • Significance60
    How much this matters to a regular citizen
  • Controversy40
    Intensity of disagreement among stakeholders
  • Entertainment10
    Compellingness for a non-policy-wonk reader
  • Buzz5
    Current news / social attention level

Publisher tools

Share or embed this record

POLISCOPE publisher tools

Share or embed this record