POLISCOPE
Back to feed
HR8552FEDERALin_committee
High Impact

Protect Democracy From Criminal Corporations Act (H.R. 8552)

Original title: Protect Democracy From Criminal Corporations Act

April 28, 2026

Track this bill to get notified when it advances a stage. One tap to stop, anytime.

Where This Stands

Introduced
Committee
Floor Vote
Passed
Signed

Currently in_committee. The next step in the legislative lifecycle is Floor Vote.

Last action
Referred to the House Committee on House Administration.May 23, 2024
Lead sponsor

Version history

Only one version on file - nothing to compare yet. As later stages (committee substitute, engrossed, enrolled) are captured, the redline appears here.

View official text →

The Frame

What this does

If passed, this bill would restrict the ability of corporations with recent felony convictions or large-dollar legal settlements to spend money on federal, state, or local election campaigns for a decade.

Who is mentioned in the record

Potentially affected actors named in the source documents. Mention is not a position.

Corporations with felony convictions or large settlements

These entities would be prohibited from making political expenditures for 10 years following their conviction or settlement agreement.

Federal, state, and local election campaigns

These campaigns would be unable to receive funds or independent expenditures from corporations meeting the 'criminal corporation' criteria.

What changed

Current stage: in_committee.

What's next

Floor Vote.

Summary

This bill proposes a 10-year ban on political spending for corporations that have been convicted of specific felonies or have entered into major legal settlement agreements involving dishonesty or fraud. It amends the Federal Election Campaign Act to restrict these corporations from making campaign contributions, s, or s.

Key Facts

  • The bill prohibits 'criminal corporations' from making any political disbursements, including campaign contributions, donations, independent expenditures, or electioneering communications.
  • The prohibition lasts for a 10-year period starting from the date of a final felony conviction or the date of a settlement agreement.
  • A 'criminal corporation' is defined as one convicted of conspiracy to defraud the U.S. (18 U.S.C. 371) or any other felony involving dishonesty or breach of trust.
  • A 'criminal corporation' also includes any corporation that enters into a non-prosecution or deferred prosecution agreement with the Attorney General involving such felonies, provided the agreement requires a payment of at least $1,000,000.
  • The ban applies to political spending at the federal, state, and local levels.
  • The restriction applies to any separate segregated fund (PAC) established by a criminal corporation.
  • The law would only apply to convictions or agreements occurring on or after the date of the Act's enactment.

Why It Matters

If passed, this bill would restrict the ability of corporations with recent felony convictions or large-dollar legal settlements to spend money on federal, state, or local election campaigns for a decade.

Frequently Asked Questions

Does this bill apply to corporations that were convicted of a crime before this bill was passed?
No, the bill specifies that the prohibition applies only to corporations convicted or entering into agreements on or after the date the Act is enacted.
What counts as a 'criminal corporation' under this bill?
A corporation is considered a 'criminal corporation' if it has been convicted of a felony involving dishonesty or breach of trust, or if it has entered into a legal settlement (like a ) with the Attorney General involving such a felony that requires a payment of $1 million or more.

News Coverage

No news coverage found yet. Articles are indexed twice daily.

Sponsors

Discoveries

Patterns POLISCOPE noticed across the record. These are observations to investigate, not conclusions.

policy shift90% confidence

Expansion of Campaign Finance Restrictions

The bill shifts from regulating the source of funds to regulating the legal status of the donor, specifically targeting corporate criminal history.

Connected Entities

personIlhan OmarPrimary sponsor of the bill.Map →
personAyanna PressleyCo-sponsor of the bill.Map →
personJan SchakowskyCo-sponsor of the bill.Map →
personRashida TlaibCo-sponsor of the bill.Map →

Analysis Score

0–100
  • Significance75
    How much this matters to a regular citizen
  • Controversy80
    Intensity of disagreement among stakeholders
  • Entertainment30
    Compellingness for a non-policy-wonk reader
  • Buzz40
    Current news / social attention level

Publisher tools

Share or embed this record

POLISCOPE publisher tools

Share or embed this record