POLISCOPE
Back to feed
Part ofNational Heritage Area →
FEDERALcongressional record

Proposed Study for Monterey Bay National Heritage Area

Original title: Text of Senate Amendment 6045

June 24, 2026

National Heritage AreaMonterey BayCaliforniaLand UseFederal Study

Track this bill to get notified when it advances a stage. One tap to stop, anytime.

The Frame

What this does

This amendment initiates a formal federal that could eventually lead to the designation of a in California, which would impact local land management and federal resource coordination in the specified counties.

Who is mentioned in the record

Potentially affected actors named in the source documents. Mention is not a position.

Residents of Monterey, San Mateo, Santa Cruz, and San Luis Obispo counties

These residents live in the region that would be subject to a federal feasibility study regarding heritage designation.

Tribal Governments

Tribal Governments are explicitly named as entities to be consulted during the federal study process.

What changed

Last recorded activity June 24, 2026.

What's next

Next step not available in the current record.

Background

  • Mr. Padilla is a U.S. Senator representing California. context
  • S. 4784 is the National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2027. context

Summary

Senator Padilla has introduced an amendment to the Department of Defense authorization bill that would require the Secretary of the Interior to study the feasibility of designating the Monterey Bay region as a . The study would evaluate potential heritage sites across Monterey, San Mateo, Santa Cruz, and San Luis Obispo counties.

Key Facts

You don't have to trust us. Each fact below is taken straight from the official document - click any one to see the exact passage, highlighted in the original.

Frequently Asked Questions

What does a National Heritage Area designation do?
The amendment does not designate the area; it only mandates a study to assess the suitability and feasibility of such a designation.
Which counties are included in the study?
The study covers Monterey, San Mateo, Santa Cruz, and San Luis Obispo counties, plus adjacent areas in California with similar heritage characteristics.

Why It Matters

This amendment initiates a formal federal that could eventually lead to the designation of a in California, which would impact local land management and federal resource coordination in the specified counties.

News Coverage

No news coverage found yet. Articles are indexed twice daily.

Sponsors

Discoveries

Patterns POLISCOPE noticed across the record. These are observations to investigate, not conclusions.

policy shift90% confidence

Regional Heritage Expansion

The amendment explicitly allows for the inclusion of 'any other area' in California that is adjacent to the primary counties, suggesting a flexible geographic scope for the study.

Monterey CountySan Mateo CountySanta Cruz CountySan Luis Obispo County

Connected Entities

locationSanta Cruz County“Part of the proposed study area.”Map →
personMr. Padilla“U.S. Senator who submitted the amendment.”Map →
organizationMonterey Bay Economic Partnership“An entity to be consulted during the study process.”Map →
locationSan Mateo County“Part of the proposed study area.”Map →
locationSan Luis Obispo County“Part of the proposed study area.”Map →
locationMonterey County“Part of the proposed study area.”Map →
organizationTribal Governments“Entities to be consulted during the study process.”Map →
organizationSecretary of the Interior“The federal official responsible for conducting the proposed study.”Map →

Sources

Open source document

www.govinfo.gov

Analysis Score

0–100
  • Significance40
    How much this matters to a regular citizen
  • Controversy10
    Intensity of disagreement among stakeholders
  • Entertainment5
    Compellingness for a non-policy-wonk reader
  • Buzz15
    Current news / social attention level

Publisher tools

Share or embed this record

POLISCOPE publisher tools

Share or embed this record