Proposed Legal Protections for Gun Stores Offering Storage
March 13, 2026
Track this bill to get notified when it advances a stage. One tap to stop, anytime.
The Frame
The bill would have limited the ability of individuals to sue gun stores for damages related to firearm storage, provided the store was operating legally and no s were in place.
Potentially affected actors named in the source documents. Mention is not a position.
Federal firearms licensees
The bill would have provided them with immunity from civil liability for acts or omissions related to firearm hold agreements.
Firearm owners
The bill would have regulated the terms under which they could enter into private storage agreements with licensed dealers.
Last recorded activity March 13, 2026.
Introduced.
Summary
Key Facts
You don't have to trust us. Each fact below is taken straight from the official document - click any one to see the exact passage, highlighted in the original.
Frequently Asked Questions
What is a firearm hold agreement?
Would this bill have protected gun stores from all lawsuits?
Why It Matters
The bill would have limited the ability of individuals to sue gun stores for damages related to firearm storage, provided the store was operating legally and no s were in place.
News Coverage
Bias ratings based on AllSides / Media Bias/Fact Check
Sponsors
Discoveries
Patterns POLISCOPE noticed across the record. These are observations to investigate, not conclusions.
Legislative Failure
The bill failed to advance past the committee stage, indicating a lack of sufficient legislative support for creating this specific civil immunity.
Connected Entities
Sources
openstates.org
Analysis Score
0–100- Significance45How much this matters to a regular citizen
- Controversy65Intensity of disagreement among stakeholders
- Entertainment5Compellingness for a non-policy-wonk reader
- Buzz10Current news / social attention level
Publisher tools