Proposed Rules for Advanced Nuclear Reactors in Florida
January 9, 2026
Track this bill to get notified when it advances a stage. One tap to stop, anytime.
Where This Stands
Currently Died in Rules. The next step in the legislative lifecycle is Introduced.
Procedural history
25 actions- Feb 26, 2026HouseIntroduced1st Reading (Committee Substitute 2)
- Feb 26, 2026HouseIntroducedCS Filed
- Feb 26, 2026HouseLaid on Table under Rule 7.18(a)
- Feb 26, 2026HouseReported out of Commerce Committee
- Feb 24, 2026HouseCommitteeFavorable with CS by Commerce Committee
- Feb 20, 2026HouseAdded to Commerce Committee agenda
Show 19 earlier actions
- Feb 17, 2026HouseNow in Commerce Committee
- Feb 17, 2026HouseReported out of Budget Committee
- Feb 16, 2026HouseCommitteeFavorable by Budget Committee
- Feb 12, 2026HouseAdded to Budget Committee agenda
- Jan 30, 2026HouseNow in Budget Committee
- Jan 30, 2026HouseCommitteeReferred to Commerce Committee
- Jan 30, 2026HouseCommitteeReferred to Budget Committee
- Jan 29, 2026HouseIntroduced1st Reading (Committee Substitute 1)
- Jan 29, 2026HouseIntroducedCS Filed
- Jan 29, 2026HouseLaid on Table under Rule 7.18(a)
- Jan 29, 2026HouseReported out of Economic Infrastructure Subcommittee
- Jan 28, 2026HouseCommitteeFavorable with CS by Economic Infrastructure Subcommittee
- Jan 26, 2026HouseAdded to Economic Infrastructure Subcommittee agenda
- Jan 15, 2026HouseNow in Economic Infrastructure Subcommittee
- Jan 15, 2026HouseCommitteeReferred to Commerce Committee
- Jan 15, 2026HouseCommitteeReferred to Budget Committee
- Jan 15, 2026HouseCommitteeReferred to Economic Infrastructure Subcommittee
- Jan 13, 2026HouseIntroduced1st Reading (Original Filed Version)
- Jan 9, 2026HouseIntroducedFiled
Version history
Only one version on file - nothing to compare yet. As later stages (committee substitute, engrossed, enrolled) are captured, the redline appears here.
View official text →The Frame
The bill would have created a new state-level permitting process for advanced nuclear technology, potentially impacting electricity rates and energy infrastructure planning for all Florida utility customers.
Potentially affected actors named in the source documents. Mention is not a position.
Florida electric utility customers
The bill aimed to influence electricity rates and the reliability of the state's electrical grid through nuclear energy integration.
Municipal electric utilities and rural electric cooperatives
These entities would have been required to develop standards for the promotion of clean renewable energy, including nuclear resources.
Florida Public Service Commission
The commission would have been granted new regulatory powers and rule-making responsibilities regarding nuclear reactor certification and permitting.
Last recorded activity January 9, 2026.
Introduced.
Background
- The Florida Public Service Commission is the state agency responsible for regulating investor-owned electric, gas, water, and wastewater utilities. context
Summary
Key Facts
You don't have to trust us. Each fact below is taken straight from the official document - click any one to see the exact passage, highlighted in the original.
Frequently Asked Questions
What is an 'advanced nuclear reactor' under this bill?
Who would have regulated these reactors?
Did this bill become law?
Why It Matters
The bill would have created a new state-level permitting process for advanced nuclear technology, potentially impacting electricity rates and energy infrastructure planning for all Florida utility customers.
News Coverage
Lobbying Activity
KAIROS POWER LLC
Voting Record
Favorable With Committee Substitute (Commerce Committee)
Total
44
Yes
40
No
0
Present
0
Not Voting
4
Abstain
0
How they voted (44)
Chip LaMarca
Republican · yes
Kim Daniels
Democratic · yes
Chuck Brannan
Republican · yes
Peggy Gossett-Seidman
Republican · yes
Erika Booth
Republican · yes
Leonard Spencer
Democratic · yes
Mike Giallombardo
Republican · yes
Gallop Franklin
Democratic · absent
Jason Shoaf
Republican · yes
Juan Porras
Republican · yes
James Buchanan
Republican · yes
Randy Maggard
Republican · yes
Dave Smith
Republican · yes
Brad Yeager
Republican · yes
Vanessa Oliver
Republican · yes
Tiffany Esposito
Republican · yes
Felicia Robinson
Democratic · yes
Yvette Benarroch
Republican · yes
Michelle Salzman
Republican · yes
Michele Rayner
Democratic · absent
Mike Giallombardo
Republican · yes
Kim Daniels
Democratic · yes
Chuck Brannan
Republican · yes
Wyman Duggan
Republican · yes
+ 20 more
Favorable (Budget Committee)
Total
41
Yes
35
No
0
Present
0
Not Voting
6
Abstain
0
How they voted (41)
Randy Maggard
Republican · yes
Gallop Franklin
Democratic · yes
Fiona McFarland
Republican · yes
Sam Garrison
Republican · yes
Lawrence McClure
Republican · yes
Chuck Brannan
Republican · yes
Jim Mooney
Republican · yes
Jason Shoaf
Republican · absent
Jenna Persons-Mulicka
Republican · yes
Toby Overdorf
Republican · yes
Jennifer Canady
Republican · absent
Susan Valdés
Republican · yes
Patt Maney
Republican · yes
JOHN SNYDER
- · yes
Demi Busatta
Republican · yes
Traci Koster
Republican · yes
Will Robinson
Republican · yes
Felicia Robinson
Democratic · yes
Sam Garrison
Republican · yes
Jim Mooney
Republican · yes
Allison Tant
Democratic · yes
Patt Maney
Republican · yes
Toby Overdorf
Republican · yes
Traci Koster
Republican · yes
+ 17 more
Favorable With Committee Substitute (Economic Infrastructure Subcommittee)
Total
27
Yes
24
No
0
Present
0
Not Voting
3
Abstain
0
How they voted (27)
Taylor Yarkosky
Republican · yes
Kim Berfield
Republican · yes
Gallop Franklin
Democratic · yes
Anna Eskamani
Democratic · yes
Jenna Persons-Mulicka
Republican · yes
Chip LaMarca
Republican · yes
Dave Smith
Republican · yes
Ryan Chamberlin
Republican · yes
Griff Griffitts
Republican · yes
Bill Conerly
Republican · yes
Shane Abbott
Republican · yes
Tae Edmonds
Democratic · absent
Kevin Chambliss
Democratic · absent
Ryan Chamberlin
Republican · yes
Anna Eskamani
Democratic · yes
Jenna Persons-Mulicka
Republican · yes
Taylor Yarkosky
Republican · yes
Chase Tramont
Republican · yes
Bill Conerly
Republican · yes
Griff Griffitts
Republican · yes
Linda Chaney
Republican · yes
Gallop Franklin
Democratic · yes
Tae Edmonds
Democratic · absent
Kim Berfield
Republican · yes
+ 3 more
Sponsors
Show 5 more sponsors
Discoveries
Patterns POLISCOPE noticed across the record. These are observations to investigate, not conclusions.
Redefinition of Clean Energy
The bill sought to explicitly include nuclear energy within the state's 'clean energy' policy definition, moving away from a focus solely on renewable energy.
Connected Entities
Sources
openstates.org
Analysis Score
0–100- Significance85How much this matters to a regular citizen
- Controversy40Intensity of disagreement among stakeholders
- Entertainment10Compellingness for a non-policy-wonk reader
- Buzz20Current news / social attention level
Publisher tools