Permanent Exemption for Private Utility Business Information in Public Meetings
November 5, 2025
Track this bill to get notified when it advances a stage. One tap to stop, anytime.
Where This Stands
Currently Laid on Table, refer to SB 7006. The next step in the legislative lifecycle is Introduced.
Procedural history
16 actions- Feb 16, 2026HouseAdded to Second Reading Calendar
- Feb 10, 2026HouseBill added to Special Order Calendar (2/19/2026)
- Jan 27, 2026HouseAdded to Second Reading Calendar
- Jan 27, 2026HouseBill released to House Calendar
- Jan 27, 2026HouseReported out of State Affairs Committee
- Jan 27, 2026HouseCommitteeFavorable by State Affairs Committee
Show 10 earlier actions
- Jan 23, 2026HouseAdded to State Affairs Committee agenda
- Jan 14, 2026HouseNow in State Affairs Committee
- Jan 14, 2026HouseReported out of Economic Infrastructure Subcommittee
- Jan 14, 2026HouseCommitteeFavorable by Economic Infrastructure Subcommittee
- Jan 13, 2026HouseIntroduced1st Reading (Original Filed Version)
- Jan 12, 2026HouseAdded to Economic Infrastructure Subcommittee agenda
- Nov 12, 2025HouseNow in Economic Infrastructure Subcommittee
- Nov 12, 2025HouseCommitteeReferred to State Affairs Committee
- Nov 12, 2025HouseCommitteeReferred to Economic Infrastructure Subcommittee
- Nov 5, 2025HouseIntroducedFiled
Version history
Only one version on file - nothing to compare yet. As later stages (committee substitute, engrossed, enrolled) are captured, the redline appears here.
View official text →The Frame
This change ensures that utility companies can continue to discuss proprietary business data in closed sessions without the public or media present, preventing that information from becoming part of the public record.
Potentially affected actors named in the source documents. Mention is not a position.
Florida Public Service Commission
The commission retains the legal authority to conduct closed-door meetings regarding proprietary business information indefinitely.
Utility companies
These entities are permitted to discuss proprietary business information in closed sessions without that data becoming public record.
Last recorded activity November 5, 2025.
Introduced.
Summary
Key Facts
You don't have to trust us. Each fact below is taken straight from the official document - click any one to see the exact passage, highlighted in the original.
Frequently Asked Questions
Does this bill make all Public Service Commission meetings private?
Can the public ever see the records from these closed meetings?
Why It Matters
This change ensures that utility companies can continue to discuss proprietary business data in closed sessions without the public or media present, preventing that information from becoming part of the public record.
News Coverage
Voting Record
Favorable (State Affairs Committee)
Total
47
Yes
43
No
2
Present
0
Not Voting
2
Abstain
0
How they voted (47)
Leonard Spencer
Democratic · yes
Jim Mooney
Republican · yes
Ashley Gantt
Democratic · absent
Nathan Boyles
Republican · yes
Anna Eskamani
Democratic · no
Berny Jacques
Republican · yes
Griff Griffitts
Republican · yes
RaShon Young
Democratic · yes
Fabián Basabe
Republican · yes
Fiona McFarland
Republican · yes
Meg Weinberger
Republican · yes
Michael Owen
Republican · yes
Richard Gentry
Republican · yes
Nan Cobb
Republican · yes
Jeff Holcomb
Republican · yes
Will Robinson
Republican · yes
Mike Giallombardo
Republican · yes
Adam Botana
Republican · yes
Angie Nixon
- · yes
Randy Maggard
Republican · yes
RaShon Young
Democratic · yes
Griff Griffitts
Republican · yes
Omar Blanco
Republican · yes
Mike Giallombardo
Republican · yes
+ 23 more
Favorable (Economic Infrastructure Subcommittee)
Total
28
Yes
26
No
1
Present
0
Not Voting
1
Abstain
0
How they voted (28)
Griff Griffitts
Republican · yes
Taylor Yarkosky
Republican · yes
Kim Berfield
Republican · yes
Shane Abbott
Republican · yes
Anna Eskamani
Democratic · no
Ryan Chamberlin
Republican · yes
Bill Conerly
Republican · yes
Jenna Persons-Mulicka
Republican · yes
Dave Smith
Republican · yes
Tae Edmonds
Democratic · yes
Chip LaMarca
Republican · yes
Gallop Franklin
Democratic · yes
Kelly Skidmore
Democratic · yes
Tae Edmonds
Democratic · yes
Taylor Yarkosky
Republican · yes
Gallop Franklin
Democratic · yes
Ryan Chamberlin
Republican · yes
Chip LaMarca
Republican · yes
Linda Chaney
Republican · yes
Shane Abbott
Republican · yes
Kim Berfield
Republican · yes
Kevin Chambliss
Democratic · yes
Bill Conerly
Republican · yes
Jenna Persons-Mulicka
Republican · yes
+ 4 more
Favorable (Government Operations Subcommittee)
Total
28
Yes
22
No
0
Present
0
Not Voting
6
Abstain
0
How they voted (28)
Danny Nix
Republican · yes
RaShon Young
Democratic · yes
Susan Plasencia
Republican · absent
Jeff Holcomb
Republican · yes
Fabián Basabe
Republican · yes
Meg Weinberger
Republican · yes
Jose Alvarez
Democratic · absent
Griff Griffitts
Republican · yes
Sam Greco
Republican · yes
Wallace Aristide
Democratic · yes
Richard Gentry
Republican · absent
Paula Stark
Republican · yes
Susan Valdés
Republican · yes
Daryl Campbell
Democratic · yes
Judson Sapp
Republican · yes
Bill Conerly
Republican · yes
Wallace Aristide
Democratic · yes
Susan Plasencia
Republican · absent
Susan Valdés
Republican · yes
Sam Greco
Republican · yes
Jose Alvarez
Democratic · absent
Judson Sapp
Republican · yes
Linda Chaney
Republican · yes
Danny Nix
Republican · yes
+ 4 more
Sponsors
Discoveries
Patterns POLISCOPE noticed across the record. These are observations to investigate, not conclusions.
Removal of Sunset Provision
The bill effectively makes a temporary transparency exemption permanent by removing the scheduled repeal date of October 2, 2026.
Connected Entities
Sources
openstates.org
Analysis Score
0–100- Significance45How much this matters to a regular citizen
- Controversy30Intensity of disagreement among stakeholders
- Entertainment5Compellingness for a non-policy-wonk reader
- Buzz10Current news / social attention level
Publisher tools