POLISCOPE
Back to feed
HR4338FEDERALUNKNOWN
Finance Detected

Route 66 National Historic Trail Designation Act

December 12, 2024

Track this bill to get notified when it advances a stage. One tap to stop, anytime.

Finance Connection

Notable money activity
$6,000across 20 reported contributions
Trace money trail →
CandidateDonorAmountIndustryDate
Steve Napolitano for MB City Council 2020BRIAN SWEENEY$300INVESTORSep 2020
Steve Napolitano for MB City Council 2020C. HAROLD KEASLER$300OWNERSep 2020
Steve Napolitano for MB City Council 2020JOHN ALTAMURA$300REALTORSep 2020
Steve Napolitano for MB City Council 2020ARNOLD PETER$300ATTORNEYSep 2020
Steve Napolitano for MB City Council 2020RUSS LESSER$300EXECUTIVESep 2020
Steve Napolitano for MB City Council 2020DAVID CASKEY$300REAL ESTATEOct 2020
Steve Napolitano for MB City Council 2020ROBERT NICKELL$300PHARMACISTSep 2020
Steve Napolitano for MB City Council 2020CHARLES MARQUIS$300RETIREDOct 2020
Steve Napolitano for MB City Council 2020BILL BLOOMFIELD$300RETIREDSep 2020
Steve Napolitano for MB City Council 2020GEORGE KARTALIS$300EXECUTIVEAug 2020
Steve Napolitano for MB City Council 2020PAULA TABALIPA$300STYLISTAug 2020
Steve Napolitano for MB City Council 2020JOHN VANDEMORE$300CFOAug 2020
Steve Napolitano for MB City Council 2020IAN LOGAN$300PHOTOGRAPHERAug 2020
Steve Napolitano for MB City Council 2020KYLE RANSFORD$300REAL ESTATEAug 2020
Steve Napolitano for MB City Council 2020CYNTHIA STRAND$300RETIREDOct 2020
Steve Napolitano for MB City Council 2020DAVID RUSHER$300PRESIDENTSep 2020
Steve Napolitano for MB City Council 2020NANCY SIMPSON$300HOMEMAKERSep 2020
Steve Napolitano for MB City Council 2020JOSEPH DEL RIEGO$300RETIREDSep 2020
Steve Napolitano for MB City Council 2020STEPHEN DEBAETS$300SELFOct 2020
Steve Napolitano for MB City Council 2020GEORGE MCNEE$300INVESTORSep 2020

Reported financial relationships and timing signals. This does not prove motive or influence. Readers draw their own conclusions.

The Frame

What this does

The designation would bring Route 66 under the administration of the National Park Service, creating a federal framework for the trail's management while protecting private property owners from involuntary land acquisition.

Who is mentioned in the record

Potentially affected actors named in the source documents. Mention is not a position.

Private landowners along Route 66

Their property rights are protected by provisions requiring consent for land acquisition and prohibiting eminent domain.

National Park Service

The agency is tasked with the administration and management of the new historic trail.

Energy developers

The bill includes provisions ensuring that trail management does not hinder energy development, production, or transmission.

What changed

Last recorded activity December 12, 2024.

What's next

Introduced.

Background

  • Route 66, historically known as the 'Main Street of America,' was one of the original highways in the U.S. Highway System, established in 1926. context

Summary

This bill proposes to officially designate Route 66 as a National Historic Trail, covering approximately 2,400 miles from Chicago to Santa Monica. It establishes federal oversight for the trail while explicitly prohibiting the use of and restricting land acquisition.

Key Facts

You don't have to trust us. Each fact below is taken straight from the official document - click any one to see the exact passage, highlighted in the original.

Frequently Asked Questions

Will the government take private land to create this trail?
No. The bill explicitly prohibits the use of or and requires the consent of the landowner for any land acquisition outside of existing federal areas.
Does this designation allow the government to regulate my property if I live near the trail?
No. The bill states that the designation does not create s and that activities outside the trail cannot be limited or regulated based on their visibility or sound from the trail.
How long is the proposed trail?
The trail is approximately 2,400 miles long, following the historic alignments of U.S. Highway 66 between 1926 and 1985.

Why It Matters

The designation would bring Route 66 under the administration of the National Park Service, creating a federal framework for the trail's management while protecting private property owners from involuntary land acquisition.

News Coverage

Sponsors

Discoveries

Patterns POLISCOPE noticed across the record. These are observations to investigate, not conclusions.

policy shift90% confidence

Pro-Energy and Property Rights Protections

The bill includes unusually explicit language protecting energy development and prohibiting eminent domain, likely to preempt local or industry opposition.

Connected Entities

dateDecember 2017Date of the map entitled 'Route 66 National Historic Trail, Proposed Route'Map →
locationChicago, IllinoisStarting point of the trailMap →
personMr. LaTurnerCo-sponsored the billMap →
dollar_amount141,279Number on the map entitled 'Route 66 National Historic Trail, Proposed Route'Map →
other2,400Approximate length of the trail in milesMap →
bill_numberH.R. 4338Bill numberMap →
locationRoute 66Historic trail being designatedMap →
personMrs. NapolitanoCo-sponsored the billMap →
personMr. NeguseCo-sponsored the billMap →
locationSanta Monica, CaliforniaEnding point of the trailMap →
personMr. LaHoodIntroduced the billMap →
dateJune 23, 2023Date the bill was introducedMap →
organizationNational Park ServiceWill administer the trailMap →

Analysis Score

0–100
  • Significance65
    How much this matters to a regular citizen
  • Controversy15
    Intensity of disagreement among stakeholders
  • Entertainment10
    Compellingness for a non-policy-wonk reader
  • Buzz25
    Current news / social attention level

Publisher tools

Share or embed this record

POLISCOPE publisher tools

Share or embed this record