Proposed Constitutional Amendment: Property Tax Exemptions for Seniors and Law Enforcement Funding Protections
October 16, 2025
Track this bill to get notified when it advances a stage. One tap to stop, anytime.
Where This Stands
Currently dead. The next step in the legislative lifecycle is Introduced.
Procedural history
14 actions- Jan 13, 2026HouseIntroduced1st Reading (Original Filed Version)
- Dec 2, 2025HouseNow in Ways & Means Committee
- Dec 2, 2025HouseReported out of State Affairs Committee
- Dec 2, 2025HouseCommitteeFavorable by State Affairs Committee
- Nov 25, 2025HouseAdded to State Affairs Committee agenda
- Nov 20, 2025HouseNow in State Affairs Committee
Show 8 earlier actions
- Nov 20, 2025HouseReported out of Select Committee on Property Taxes
- Nov 20, 2025HouseCommitteeFavorable by Select Committee on Property Taxes
- Nov 13, 2025HouseAdded to Select Committee on Property Taxes agenda
- Oct 16, 2025HouseNow in Select Committee on Property Taxes
- Oct 16, 2025HouseCommitteeReferred to Ways & Means Committee
- Oct 16, 2025HouseCommitteeReferred to State Affairs Committee
- Oct 16, 2025HouseCommitteeReferred to Select Committee on Property Taxes
- Oct 16, 2025HouseIntroducedFiled
Version history
Only one version on file - nothing to compare yet. As later stages (committee substitute, engrossed, enrolled) are captured, the redline appears here.
View official text →The Frame
The measure would shift the local tax burden away from seniors while simultaneously restricting the ability of counties and municipalities to reduce law enforcement spending, regardless of potential declines in property tax revenue.
Potentially affected actors named in the source documents. Mention is not a position.
Homeowners age 65 or older
They would become eligible for an exemption from non-school property tax levies on their homesteads.
Counties and municipalities
They would be required to maintain law enforcement funding at specific historical levels and would see a reduction in their non-school ad valorem tax revenue.
Law enforcement agencies
Their funding levels would be protected from reductions by local governments.
Last recorded activity October 16, 2025.
Introduced.
Summary
Key Facts
You don't have to trust us. Each fact below is taken straight from the official document - click any one to see the exact passage, highlighted in the original.
Why It Matters
The measure would shift the local tax burden away from seniors while simultaneously restricting the ability of counties and municipalities to reduce law enforcement spending, regardless of potential declines in property tax revenue.
Frequently Asked Questions
Does this exemption apply to school district taxes?
Can my local city or county cut police funding if their tax revenue drops?
When would these changes start?
News Coverage
Bias ratings based on AllSides / Media Bias/Fact Check
Voting Record
Favorable (State Affairs Committee)
Total
40
Yes
26
No
12
Present
0
Not Voting
2
Abstain
0
How they voted (40)
Angie Nixon
- · no
RaShon Young
Democratic · no
Michael Owen
Republican · yes
Fiona McFarland
Republican · yes
Mike Giallombardo
Republican · yes
Griff Griffitts
Republican · yes
Ashley Gantt
Democratic · no
Jeff Holcomb
Republican · absent
Meg Weinberger
Republican · yes
Will Robinson
Republican · yes
Fabián Basabe
Republican · yes
Jim Mooney
Republican · yes
Berny Jacques
Republican · yes
Nathan Boyles
Republican · yes
Anna Eskamani
Democratic · no
Adam Botana
Republican · yes
Leonard Spencer
Democratic · no
Richard Gentry
Republican · yes
Randy Maggard
Republican · yes
Nan Cobb
Republican · yes
Angie Nixon
- · no
Fiona McFarland
Republican · yes
Debra Tendrich
Democratic · no
Nathan Boyles
Republican · yes
+ 16 more
Favorable (Select Committee on Property Taxes)
Total
63
Yes
45
No
12
Present
0
Not Voting
6
Abstain
0
How they voted (63)
Berny Jacques
Republican · yes
Gallop Franklin
Democratic · no
Griff Griffitts
Republican · yes
Juan Porras
Republican · yes
Dianne Hart-Lowman
Democratic · absent
Meg Weinberger
Republican · yes
Shane Abbott
Republican · yes
Robbie Brackett
Republican · yes
Jon Albert
Republican · yes
Michael Owen
Republican · yes
Patt Maney
Republican · yes
Jim Mooney
Republican · yes
Jeff Holcomb
Republican · absent
Anna Eskamani
Democratic · no
Dean Black
Republican · yes
Toby Overdorf
Republican · yes
Judson Sapp
Republican · yes
Doug Bankson
Republican · yes
Tae Edmonds
Democratic · no
Yvette Benarroch
Republican · yes
Danny Nix
Republican · yes
Monique Miller
Republican · yes
Richard Gentry
Republican · yes
Ryan Chamberlin
Republican · yes
+ 39 more
Sponsors
Discoveries
Patterns POLISCOPE noticed across the record. These are observations to investigate, not conclusions.
Fiscal Mandate vs. Tax Relief
The bill explicitly acknowledges that the senior tax exemption will reduce ad valorem revenue but mandates that law enforcement funding remain protected regardless of that revenue loss.
Connected Entities
Sources
openstates.org
Analysis Score
0–100- Significance85How much this matters to a regular citizen
- Controversy75Intensity of disagreement among stakeholders
- Entertainment10Compellingness for a non-policy-wonk reader
- Buzz20Current news / social attention level
Publisher tools