POLISCOPE
Back to feed
HR9717FEDERALIN_COMMITTEE
High Impact

Proposed Ban on Importing Specific Russian Minerals

Original title: Stop Russian Market Manipulation Act

December 17, 2024

Track this bill to get notified when it advances a stage. One tap to stop, anytime.

Where This Stands

Introduced
Committee
Floor Vote
Passed
Signed

Currently IN_COMMITTEE. The next step in the legislative lifecycle is Floor Vote.

Version history

Only one version on file - nothing to compare yet. As later stages (committee substitute, engrossed, enrolled) are captured, the redline appears here.

View official text →

The Frame

What this does

If passed, this bill would permanently restrict U.S. access to Russian-sourced copper, nickel, and , potentially impacting domestic supply chains and manufacturing costs for industries that rely on these materials.

Who is mentioned in the record

Potentially affected actors named in the source documents. Mention is not a position.

U.S. manufacturing and industrial sectors

These sectors would be prohibited from importing specific minerals from the Russian Federation, requiring them to source these materials from other suppliers.

Russian mineral producers

These entities would be barred from exporting the specified minerals to the United States.

What changed

Current stage: IN_COMMITTEE.

What's next

Floor Vote.

Background

  • Mr. Zinke is a member of the U.S. House of Representatives representing Montana's 1st congressional district. context
  • The Committee on Ways and Means is the chief tax-writing committee in the U.S. House of Representatives and has jurisdiction over trade policy. context

Summary

This bill would ban the import of eight specific minerals produced in Russia or by Russian-controlled companies starting 90 days after the law is enacted. The ban would remain in place until the President certifies that Russia has ended all hostilities against Ukraine, with provisions to automatically restart the ban if hostilities resume within three years.

Key Facts

You don't have to trust us. Each fact below is taken straight from the official document - click any one to see the exact passage, highlighted in the original.

Frequently Asked Questions

Which minerals would be banned from import?
The bill lists eight specific minerals: , copper, nickel, palladium, platinum, rhodium, ruthenium, and zinc.
Can the President waive this ban?
No, the bill explicitly states that the President may not waive the prohibition, notwithstanding any other provision of law.
How long would the ban last?
The ban lasts until one year after the President certifies that Russia has ended all hostilities against Ukraine, though it can be reinstated if hostilities resume within three years of that certification.

Why It Matters

If passed, this bill would permanently restrict U.S. access to Russian-sourced copper, nickel, and , potentially impacting domestic supply chains and manufacturing costs for industries that rely on these materials.

News Coverage

No news coverage found yet. Articles are indexed twice daily.

Sponsors

Discoveries

Patterns POLISCOPE noticed across the record. These are observations to investigate, not conclusions.

policy shift100% confidence

Non-waivable Sanction

The bill includes a 'No Waiver' clause, which is a restrictive legislative tool that removes executive discretion in enforcing the trade ban.

Connected Entities

organizationCongressReceives certification from the PresidentMap →
personMr. GuthrieCo-sponsor of the billMap →
locationRussian FederationSource of the mineralsMap →
organizationHouse of RepresentativesBill enacted by the House of RepresentativesMap →
organizationRussian entityDefinition within the billMap →
personPresidentCertifies end of hostilitiesMap →
personMr. ZinkeIntroduced the billMap →
organizationU.S. Government Publishing OfficeSource of the documentMap →
personMr. Smith of New JerseyCo-sponsor of the billMap →
organizationSenateBill enacted by the Senate and House of RepresentativesMap →

Analysis Score

0–100
  • Significance85
    How much this matters to a regular citizen
  • Controversy75
    Intensity of disagreement among stakeholders
  • Entertainment10
    Compellingness for a non-policy-wonk reader
  • Buzz40
    Current news / social attention level

Publisher tools

Share or embed this record

POLISCOPE publisher tools

Share or embed this record