POLISCOPE
Back to feed
Part ofBorder Security →
FEDERALcongressional record

Proposed Cross-Border Aerial Law Enforcement Program

Original title: Text of Senate Amendment 6254

June 24, 2026

Border SecurityAviationLaw EnforcementPrivacyCanada-US RelationsCongressional Oversight

Track this bill to get notified when it advances a stage. One tap to stop, anytime.

The Frame

What this does

This amendment establishes the legal framework for joint U.S.-Canada aerial patrols and drone monitoring along the northern border, while explicitly prohibiting the authorization of any new federal funding for these operations.

Who is mentioned in the record

Potentially affected actors named in the source documents. Mention is not a position.

U.S. Customs and Border Protection

The agency is authorized to staff and participate in the proposed cross-border aerial law enforcement program.

United States Coast Guard

The agency is authorized to staff and participate in the proposed cross-border aerial law enforcement program.

Homeland Security Investigations

The agency is authorized to staff and participate in the proposed cross-border aerial law enforcement program.

What changed

Last recorded activity June 24, 2026.

What's next

Next step not available in the current record.

Background

  • S. 4784 is the National Defense Authorization Act (NDAA), which provides the annual budget and policy framework for the Department of Defense. context

Summary

Senator Hassan has introduced an amendment to the 2027 defense authorization bill that would allow the Department of Homeland Security to create a joint aerial law enforcement program with Canada. The program would operate within 50 miles of the border and requires specific privacy and civil rights protections for U.S. citizens. The proposal also mandates reports on the use of unmanned aircraft systems (drones) along the northern border.

Key Facts

You don't have to trust us. Each fact below is taken straight from the official document - click any one to see the exact passage, highlighted in the original.

Frequently Asked Questions

Will this program cost taxpayers more money?
No. The amendment explicitly states that no additional funds are authorized to be for carrying out this section.
What is the geographic limit for these aerial operations?
The jurisdiction is generally limited to territory within 50 miles of either side of the U.S.-Canada border, unless or operational needs require otherwise.
What protections are in place for privacy and civil rights?
The program requires specific provisions in the to protect U.S. citizens' privacy and civil liberties, and mandates that all participating officers complete training on these responsibilities.

Why It Matters

This amendment establishes the legal framework for joint U.S.-Canada aerial patrols and drone monitoring along the northern border, while explicitly prohibiting the authorization of any new federal funding for these operations.

News Coverage

No news coverage found yet. Articles are indexed twice daily.

Sponsors

Discoveries

Patterns POLISCOPE noticed across the record. These are observations to investigate, not conclusions.

policy shift90% confidence

Expansion of Maritime Model to Aerial Operations

The amendment explicitly seeks to model new aerial law enforcement operations after an existing 2009 maritime agreement, indicating a shift toward standardizing cross-border enforcement across different domains.

United States GovernmentGovernment of Canada

Connected Entities

organizationHomeland Security Investigations“Potential participant in the program.”Map →
organizationUnited States Government“Party to the proposed bilateral agreement.”Map →
organizationU.S. Customs and Border Protection“Potential participant in the program.”Map →
personMs. Hassan“U.S. Senator who submitted the amendment.”Map →
organizationUnited States Coast Guard“Potential participant in the program.”Map →
organizationDepartment of Homeland Security“The agency authorized to establish the program.”Map →
organizationGovernment of Canada“Party to the proposed bilateral agreement.”Map →

Sources

Open source document

www.govinfo.gov

Analysis Score

0–100
  • Significance65
    How much this matters to a regular citizen
  • Controversy30
    Intensity of disagreement among stakeholders
  • Entertainment10
    Compellingness for a non-policy-wonk reader
  • Buzz20
    Current news / social attention level

Publisher tools

Share or embed this record

POLISCOPE publisher tools

Share or embed this record