Closing the Mediation & Arbitration Trust Fund
June 17, 2026
Track this bill to get notified when it advances a stage. One tap to stop, anytime.
Where This Stands
Currently passed_both. The next step in the legislative lifecycle is Signed.
Version history
Only one version on file - nothing to compare yet. As later stages (committee substitute, engrossed, enrolled) are captured, the redline appears here.
View official text →The Frame
The closure of this fund changes how the state manages and distributes money previously earmarked for mediation and arbitration services within the court system.
Potentially affected actors named in the source documents. Mention is not a position.
State Court System
The court system must implement new procedures for the termination of the trust fund and the management of its former revenue streams.
Current stage: passed_both.
Signed.
Background
- Trust funds in state government are typically created by the legislature to ring-fence money for specific programs, and their termination is a standard method for budget consolidation. context
Summary
Key Facts
You don't have to trust us. Each fact below is taken straight from the official document - click any one to see the exact passage, highlighted in the original.
Why It Matters
The closure of this fund changes how the state manages and distributes money previously earmarked for mediation and arbitration services within the court system.
Frequently Asked Questions
What happens to the money currently in the Mediation & Arbitration Trust Fund?
Will mediation and arbitration services still be funded?
News Coverage
Voting Record
Third Reading
Total
39
Yes
37
No
0
Present
0
Not Voting
0
Abstain
0
How they voted (39)
Mack Bernard
Democratic · yes
Tom Leek
Republican · yes
Ralph Massullo
Republican · yes
Kristen Arrington
Democratic · yes
Dave Smith
Republican · yes
Jim Boyd
Republican · yes
Keith Truenow
Republican · yes
Corey Simon
Republican · yes
Jennifer Bradley
Republican · yes
Colleen Burton
Republican · yes
Ileana Garcia
Republican · yes
Jay Trumbull
Republican · yes
Jason Brodeur
Republican · yes
Rosalind Osgood
Democratic · yes
Lori Berman
Democratic · yes
Barbara Sharief
Democratic · yes
Ana Maria Rodriguez
Republican · yes
Alexis Calatayud
Republican · yes
Tina Polsky
Democratic · yes
Ben Albritton
Republican · yes
Jonathan Martin
Republican · yes
Kathleen Passidomo
Republican · yes
Don Gaetz
Republican · yes
Darryl Rouson
Democratic · yes
+ 15 more
Passage, Third Reading
Total
117
Yes
105
No
0
Present
0
Not Voting
12
Abstain
0
How they voted (117)
Lisa Dunkley
Democratic · yes
Jennifer Kincart Jonsson
Republican · yes
Tiffany Esposito
Republican · yes
Michelle Salzman
Republican · yes
Taylor Yarkosky
Republican · yes
Kim Kendall
Republican · yes
Danny Alvarez
Republican · yes
Kiyan Michael
Republican · yes
Gallop Franklin
Democratic · yes
Kaylee Tuck
Republican · yes
Anna Eskamani
Democratic · yes
Robin Bartleman
Democratic · yes
Chuck Brannan
Republican · yes
Mike Gottlieb
Democratic · yes
Bill Conerly
Republican · yes
Leonard Spencer
Democratic · yes
Rob Long
Democratic · yes
Judson Sapp
Republican · yes
Chase Tramont
Republican · yes
Brad Yeager
Republican · yes
Jeff Holcomb
Republican · yes
Rita Harris
Democratic · yes
J.J. Grow
Republican · yes
Kim Berfield
Republican · yes
+ 93 more
Sponsors
Discoveries
Patterns POLISCOPE noticed across the record. These are observations to investigate, not conclusions.
Consolidation of Court Funding
The termination of a specific mediation and arbitration fund suggests a shift toward centralizing court system finances.
Connected Entities
Sources
openstates.org
Analysis Score
0–100- Significance60How much this matters to a regular citizen
- Controversy20Intensity of disagreement among stakeholders
- Entertainment5Compellingness for a non-policy-wonk reader
- Buzz10Current news / social attention level
Publisher tools