Proposed Changes to Unemployment Benefit Verification and Fraud Detection
March 13, 2026
Track this bill to get notified when it advances a stage. One tap to stop, anytime.
The Frame
The bill would have changed the eligibility verification process for all unemployment claimants in Florida, requiring the state to confirm identity, life status, and employment status every two weeks before issuing payments.
Potentially affected actors named in the source documents. Mention is not a position.
Unemployment benefit claimants
Claimants would have been subject to more frequent and rigorous eligibility verification checks.
Florida employers
Employers would have received annual notifications regarding a new web page for reporting suspected unemployment fraud.
Department of Commerce
The department would have been tasked with new verification, investigation, and reporting duties.
Last recorded activity March 13, 2026.
Introduced.
Summary
Key Facts
You don't have to trust us. Each fact below is taken straight from the official document - click any one to see the exact passage, highlighted in the original.
Frequently Asked Questions
What would this bill have changed for unemployment claimants?
How would the state have detected fraud under this bill?
Would employers have had a role in this process?
Why It Matters
The bill would have changed the eligibility verification process for all unemployment claimants in Florida, requiring the state to confirm identity, life status, and employment status every two weeks before issuing payments.
News Coverage
Voting Record
Passage, Third Reading
Total
117
Yes
81
No
31
Present
0
Not Voting
5
Abstain
0
How they voted (117)
Jennifer Canady
Republican · yes
Mike Gottlieb
Democratic · no
Kim Berfield
Republican · yes
John Snyder
Republican · yes
Griff Griffitts
Republican · yes
Alex Andrade
Republican · yes
Mike Redondo
Republican · yes
Dianne Hart-Lowman
Democratic · no
Susan Valdés
Republican · yes
Tyler Sirois
Republican · yes
Brad Yeager
Republican · yes
Jose Alvarez
Democratic · no
Dean Black
Republican · yes
Rita Harris
Democratic · no
Gallop Franklin
Democratic · no
Omar Blanco
Republican · yes
Webster Barnaby
Republican · yes
Bill Conerly
Republican · yes
Doug Bankson
Republican · yes
Yvonne Hinson
Democratic · no
Mitch Rosenwald
Democratic · no
Jason Shoaf
Republican · yes
Chip LaMarca
Republican · yes
Leonard Spencer
Democratic · no
+ 93 more
Favorable (Commerce Committee)
Total
27
Yes
15
No
5
Present
0
Not Voting
7
Abstain
0
How they voted (27)
Kevin Chambliss
Democratic · no
Chase Tramont
Republican · not voting
Yvette Benarroch
Republican · yes
Brad Yeager
Republican · yes
Randy Maggard
Republican · yes
Gallop Franklin
Democratic · not voting
Michelle Salzman
Republican · yes
Michele Rayner
Democratic · not voting
Tiffany Esposito
Republican · yes
Fentrice Driskell
Democratic · no
Tyler Sirois
Republican · yes
Vanessa Oliver
Republican · yes
Felicia Robinson
Democratic · no
Erika Booth
Republican · yes
Juan Porras
Republican · yes
Christine Hunschofsky
Democratic · no
Mike Giallombardo
Republican · not voting
James Buchanan
Republican · yes
Kim Daniels
Democratic · not voting
Chip LaMarca
Republican · not voting
Chuck Brannan
Republican · yes
Jason Shoaf
Republican · not voting
Leonard Spencer
Democratic · no
David Borrero
Republican · yes
+ 3 more
Favorable (Housing, Agriculture & Tourism Subcommittee)
Total
17
Yes
12
No
4
Present
0
Not Voting
1
Abstain
0
How they voted (17)
Felicia Robinson
Democratic · no
Gallop Franklin
Democratic · no
Hillary Cassel
Republican · yes
Shane Abbott
Republican · yes
Jon Albert
Republican · yes
Lindsay Cross
Democratic · no
Erika Booth
Republican · yes
Kaylee Tuck
Republican · yes
Vicki Lopez
Republican · yes
Christine Hunschofsky
Democratic · no
Michelle Salzman
Republican · yes
Jim Mooney
Republican · yes
Mike Redondo
Republican · yes
Bill Partington
Republican · not voting
Peggy Gossett-Seidman
Republican · yes
Jenna Persons-Mulicka
Republican · yes
Chase Tramont
Republican · yes
Sponsors
Discoveries
Patterns POLISCOPE noticed across the record. These are observations to investigate, not conclusions.
Increased Fraud Monitoring
The bill represents a shift toward automated, data-driven fraud detection by requiring cross-checks of IP addresses and shared contact information.
Connected Entities
Sources
openstates.org
Analysis Score
0–100- Significance65How much this matters to a regular citizen
- Controversy50Intensity of disagreement among stakeholders
- Entertainment10Compellingness for a non-policy-wonk reader
- Buzz20Current news / social attention level
Publisher tools