NewsNoticias Tampa Bay (Univision)August 3, 2026Hillsborough
New Mexico Supreme Court excludes patient statements from Alexee Trevizo homicide trial
The New Mexico Supreme Court ruled unanimously that statements made by Alexee Trevizo to her doctor following the discovery of her deceased newborn are protected by physician-patient privilege and cannot be used as evidence in her homicide trial. The court determined that Trevizo's physical condition and the presence of police in the room prevented a voluntary waiver of her medical confidentiality rights.
Read the full story at Noticias Tampa Bay (Univision)Why It Matters
This ruling significantly limits the evidence available to prosecutors in a high-profile homicide case, establishing a legal precedent regarding the boundaries of medical confidentiality during emergency medical treatment.
Key Facts
- The New Mexico Supreme Court ruled that statements made by Alexee Trevizo to her doctor are protected by physician-patient privilege.
- The ruling prevents the prosecution from using these specific statements as evidence in the homicide trial.
- The court rejected the prosecution's argument that the presence of police and the defendant's mother constituted an implied waiver of confidentiality.
- The court found that the defendant's physical state—including pain, medication, and blood loss—prevented a voluntary waiver of rights.
- The court clarified that mandatory reporting laws for child abuse do not override the general physician-patient privilege for other communications.
- The case involves charges of first-degree homicide and tampering with evidence.
- The incident occurred in January 2023 at the Artesia General Hospital.
- The case will now return to the Eddy County District Court for pre-trial proceedings.
- A previous online petition regarding the defendant's university enrollment gathered over 20,000 signatures.
Who's Mentioned
personAlexee Trevizo“Defendant in a homicide case.”organizationNew Mexico Supreme Court“The court that issued the ruling.”personHeather Vaskas“Doctor who treated the defendant.”personMichael E. Vigil“Judge who authored the court's opinion.”locationEddy County“Jurisdiction where the trial is taking place.”