Changes to Petroleum Cleanup and Insurance Programs
February 16, 2026
Track this bill to get notified when it advances a stage. One tap to stop, anytime.
Where This Stands
Currently Died pending reference review under Rule 4.7(2). The next step in the legislative lifecycle is Introduced.
Procedural history
14 actions- Feb 25, 2026SenateOn Committee agenda-- Appropriations, 03/02/26, 12:00 pm, 110 Senate Building
- Feb 20, 2026HouseConference Committee appointed
- Feb 19, 2026SenateEnrolledReceived
- Feb 19, 2026SenateCommitteeReferred to Appropriations
- Feb 19, 2026SenateIn Messages
- Feb 19, 2026HouseRequests that the Senate pass the bill as passed by the House or agree to include the bill in the Budget Conference
Show 8 earlier actions
- Feb 19, 2026HouseFloorPassed; YEAS 106, NAYS 0
- Feb 19, 2026HouseFloorRead 3rd time
- Feb 19, 2026HouseAdded to Third Reading Calendar
- Feb 19, 2026HouseFloorRead 2nd time
- Feb 16, 2026HouseIntroduced1st Reading (Original Filed Version)
- Feb 16, 2026HouseBill added to Special Order Calendar (2/19/2026)
- Feb 16, 2026HouseBill referred to House Calendar
- Feb 16, 2026HouseIntroducedFiled
Version history
Only one version on file - nothing to compare yet. As later stages (committee substitute, engrossed, enrolled) are captured, the redline appears here.
View official text →The Frame
The bill would have shifted the full financial burden of petroleum cleanup costs from property owners to the state's for the 2025-2026 , potentially impacting the fund's long-term solvency.
Potentially affected actors named in the source documents. Mention is not a position.
Petroleum storage system owners
Owners would have been relieved of paying deductibles, copayments, and costs exceeding standard monetary caps for cleanup activities.
Inland Protection Trust Fund
The fund would have been required to absorb all cleanup and insurance costs without the ability to seek reimbursement or recovery.
Last recorded activity February 16, 2026.
Introduced.
Summary
Key Facts
You don't have to trust us. Each fact below is taken straight from the official document - click any one to see the exact passage, highlighted in the original.
Frequently Asked Questions
Did this bill become law?
What would have happened to my cleanup costs if this passed?
Why It Matters
The bill would have shifted the full financial burden of petroleum cleanup costs from property owners to the state's for the 2025-2026 , potentially impacting the fund's long-term solvency.
News Coverage
Voting Record
Passage, Third Reading
Total
203
Yes
183
No
0
Present
0
Not Voting
20
Abstain
0
How they voted (203)
JOHN SNYDER
- · yes
RaShon Young
Democratic · yes
Fiona McFarland
Republican · yes
Rachel Plakon
Republican · yes
Rob Long
Democratic · yes
Adam Botana
Republican · yes
Daryl Campbell
Democratic · absent
Sam Greco
Republican · yes
Dotie Joseph
Democratic · absent
Lawrence McClure
Republican · yes
Jose Alvarez
Democratic · yes
Vanessa Oliver
Republican · yes
Richard Gentry
Republican · yes
Jeff Holcomb
Republican · yes
Jenna Persons-Mulicka
Republican · yes
Chuck Brannan
Republican · yes
Anne Gerwig
Republican · yes
Traci Koster
Republican · yes
Sam Garrison
Republican · yes
Susan Valdés
Republican · absent
Jennifer Canady
Republican · yes
Taylor Yarkosky
Republican · yes
Leonard Spencer
Democratic · yes
Michael Owen
Republican · yes
+ 179 more
Sponsors
Discoveries
Patterns POLISCOPE noticed across the record. These are observations to investigate, not conclusions.
Temporary Suspension of Cost-Sharing
The bill attempted a one-year suspension of all cost-sharing mechanisms (deductibles/copays) for petroleum cleanup, signaling a temporary shift toward full state funding.
Connected Entities
Sources
openstates.org
Analysis Score
0–100- Significance65How much this matters to a regular citizen
- Controversy40Intensity of disagreement among stakeholders
- Entertainment10Compellingness for a non-policy-wonk reader
- Buzz20Current news / social attention level
Publisher tools