House Resolution 354: Setting Rules for Floor Debates on Five Environmental and Land-Use Rules
April 28, 2025
Track this bill to get notified when it advances a stage. One tap to stop, anytime.
The Frame
This resolution determines the legislative path for overturning rules governing vehicle emissions, endangered species protections, and motor vehicle access in the Glen Canyon National Recreation Area, directly impacting the regulatory authority of the EPA, the Fish and Wildlife Service, and the National Park Service.
Potentially affected actors named in the source documents. Mention is not a position.
National Park Service
The agency's rule regarding motor vehicles in the Glen Canyon National Recreation Area is subject to a disapproval resolution.
United States Fish and Wildlife Service
The agency's rule regarding the endangered status of the Longfin Smelt is subject to a disapproval resolution.
Environmental Protection Agency
Three of the agency's rules regarding California vehicle emission standards are subject to disapproval resolutions.
Last recorded activity April 28, 2025.
Introduced.
Background
- The Congressional Review Act (CRA) allows Congress to overturn federal agency rules through a joint resolution of disapproval, which requires a simple majority in both chambers and the President's signature. context
Summary
Key Facts
You don't have to trust us. Each fact below is taken straight from the official document - click any one to see the exact passage, highlighted in the original.
Frequently Asked Questions
What does this resolution actually do?
Does this resolution change environmental laws directly?
How much time will be spent debating these issues?
Why It Matters
This resolution determines the legislative path for overturning rules governing vehicle emissions, endangered species protections, and motor vehicle access in the Glen Canyon National Recreation Area, directly impacting the regulatory authority of the EPA, the Fish and Wildlife Service, and the National Park Service.
News Coverage
Voting Record
Total
424
Yes
216
No
208
Present
0
Not Voting
0
Abstain
0
How they voted (424)
Lloyd Smucker
R · yes
Gary Palmer
R · yes
John Mannion
D · no
Brett Guthrie
R · yes
Brian Mast
R · yes
Nydia Velázquez
D · no
James Clyburn
D · no
Marc Veasey
D · no
J. Correa
D · no
Thomas Kean
R · yes
Mark Alford
R · yes
Ritchie Torres
D · no
Tracey Mann
R · yes
Bruce Westerman
R · yes
Jason Smith
R · yes
Doris Matsui
D · no
James Himes
D · no
Ilhan Omar
D · no
Cory Mills
R · yes
Ami Bera
D · no
Michael Simpson
R · yes
Elijah Crane
R · yes
Pete Sessions
R · yes
Jared Moskowitz
D · no
+ 400 more
Sponsors
Discoveries
Patterns POLISCOPE noticed across the record. These are observations to investigate, not conclusions.
Coordinated Regulatory Disapproval
The resolution bundles five distinct environmental and land-use rules for simultaneous legislative consideration, indicating a coordinated effort to challenge agency rulemaking authority.
Connected Entities
Sources
www.congress.gov
Analysis Score
0–100- Significance85How much this matters to a regular citizen
- Controversy80Intensity of disagreement among stakeholders
- Entertainment20Compellingness for a non-policy-wonk reader
- Buzz60Current news / social attention level
Publisher tools