POLISCOPE
Back to feed
HJRES182FEDERALIN_COMMITTEE
High Impact

Resolution to Overturn HHS Rule on LGBTQI+ Foster Care Placements

Original title: Disapproving the rule submitted by the Department of Health and Human Services relating to "Designated Placement Requirements for LGBTQI plus Children".

July 10, 2024

Track this bill to get notified when it advances a stage. One tap to stop, anytime.

Where This Stands

Introduced
Committee
Floor Vote
Passed

Currently IN_COMMITTEE. The next step in the legislative lifecycle is Floor Vote.

Version history

Only one version on file - nothing to compare yet. As later stages (committee substitute, engrossed, enrolled) are captured, the redline appears here.

View official text →

The Frame

What this does

The resolution directly challenges federal standards that require foster care agencies to ensure LGBTQI+ youth are placed in environments that support their sexual orientation and gender identity, potentially impacting how states and private agencies manage foster care placements.

Who is mentioned in the record

Potentially affected actors named in the source documents. Mention is not a position.

LGBTQI+ children in foster care

The resolution seeks to remove federal requirements intended to ensure their placement in supportive foster environments.

Foster care agencies

These agencies are subject to the HHS rule regarding placement requirements for LGBTQI+ youth.

What changed

Current stage: IN_COMMITTEE.

What's next

Floor Vote.

Summary

This resolution seeks to invalidate a federal rule from the Department of Health and Human Services (HHS) that sets specific placement requirements for LGBTQI+ children in foster care. If passed, the rule published on April 30, 2024, would be nullified and have no legal .

Key Facts

You don't have to trust us. Each fact below is taken straight from the official document - click any one to see the exact passage, highlighted in the original.

Why It Matters

The resolution directly challenges federal standards that require foster care agencies to ensure LGBTQI+ youth are placed in environments that support their sexual orientation and gender identity, potentially impacting how states and private agencies manage foster care placements.

Frequently Asked Questions

What does this resolution do?
It is a Congressional disapproval resolution that, if passed, would cancel a specific federal rule regarding foster care placements for LGBTQI+ children.
What is the status of the rule right now?
The rule was published on April 30, 2024; this resolution is currently in the committee stage and has not been enacted.

News Coverage

No news coverage found yet. Articles are indexed twice daily.

Sponsors

Show 5 more sponsors

Discoveries

Patterns POLISCOPE noticed across the record. These are observations to investigate, not conclusions.

policy shift90% confidence

Congressional Review Act usage

The resolution utilizes the mechanism of a disapproval resolution to target a specific agency rule shortly after its publication in the Federal Register.

Connected Entities

organizationCongressThe body initiating the disapproval resolution.Map →
personMr. GosarCo-sponsor of the resolution.Map →
personMr. Higgins of LouisianaCo-sponsor of the resolution.Map →
otherFederal RegisterPublication source of the rule.Map →
personMr. BanksLead sponsor of the resolution.Map →
personMr. PalmerCo-sponsor of the resolution.Map →
dateApril 30, 2024Date the rule was published in the Federal Register.Map →
personMr. DuncanCo-sponsor of the resolution.Map →
personMr. GrothmanCo-sponsor of the resolution.Map →
organizationHHSAbbreviation for Department of Health and Human Services.Map →
organizationDepartment of Health and Human ServicesThe agency responsible for issuing the rule being challenged.Map →
personMr. LaMalfaCo-sponsor of the resolution.Map →
personMr. TimmonsCo-sponsor of the resolution.Map →
bill_number89 Fed. Reg. 34818 et seq.Federal Register volume and page number where the rule is published.Map →
personMr. EllzeyCo-sponsor of the resolution.Map →
personMrs. Miller of IllinoisCo-sponsor of the resolution.Map →

Analysis Score

0–100
  • Significance80
    How much this matters to a regular citizen
  • Controversy90
    Intensity of disagreement among stakeholders
  • Entertainment20
    Compellingness for a non-policy-wonk reader
  • Buzz60
    Current news / social attention level

Publisher tools

Share or embed this record

POLISCOPE publisher tools

Share or embed this record