ForwardDallas

The available records identify this entity, but do not yet include a plain-English role description.

1. Wed, Jun 102 items
   1. A public hearing to receive comments regarding an application for and an ordinance granting an amendment to Specific Use Permit No. 2302 for an attached projecting non-premise district activity videoboard sign on property zoned CA-1(A) Central Area District, on the east line of North Cesar Chavez Boulevard, between Elm Street and Main Street Recommendation of Staff: Approval, subject to conditions Recommendation of CPC: Approval for a six-year period, subject to conditions Z234-342(JG)/Z-25-000126 *In alignment with ForwardDallas.The city's comprehensive land use plan that the proposal aligns with.
   2. A public hearing to receive comments regarding an application for and an ordinance granting a new Planned Development Subdistrict for MF-2 Subdistrict uses on property zoned MF-2 Multifamily Subdistrict within Planned Development District No. 193, the Oak Lawn Special Purpose District, on the north line of Newton Avenue, between Throckmorton Street and Oak Lawn Avenue Recommendation of Staff: Approval, subject to a development plan and staff’s recommended conditions Recommendation of CPC: Approval, subject to a development plan and conditions Z-25-000209 *In alignment with ForwardDallas.
2. Wed, May 271 item
   1. A public hearing to receive comments regarding consideration of amendments to Sections 51-4.208, 51-4.210, and 51A-4.210 of the Dallas City Code to remove “Commercial Wedding Chapel” and create regulations for a new “Reception Facility” land use, and an ordinance granting the amendments Recommendation of Staff: Approval of staff’s recommended amendments Recommendation of ZOAC: Approval of ZOAC’s recommended amendments Recommendation of CPC: Approval of CPC's recommended amendments DCA 256-001(MW) *In alignment with ForwardDallas.The city's comprehensive land-use plan that the amendments align with.

POLISCOPE has no related bills, finance activity or mapped connections for this entity in the records it has processed. That is a gap in coverage, not a finding about the entity.