Building Better Communities General Obligation Bond Program

The available records identify this entity, but do not yet include a plain-English role description.

1. Tue, May 83 items
   1. RESOLUTION WAIVING ADMINISTRATIVE RULES’ ELIGIBILITY REQUIREMENTS FOR APPLICANTS OF PROJECT 124 FUNDS; APPROVING INTERLOCAL AGREEMENT, AS AMENDED IN THE MANNER SET FORTH IN THIS RESOLUTION, BETWEEN VILLAGE OF PALMETTO BAY AND MIAMI-DADE COUNTY RELATING TO GRANT IN AMOUNT OF $7,500,000.00 FROM BUILDING BETTER COMMUNITIES GENERAL OBLIGATION BOND PROGRAM PROJECT 124 ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT FUND; AUTHORIZING COUNTY MAYOR OR COUNTY MAYOR’S DESIGNEE TO EXECUTE AND DELIVER AMENDED INTERLOCAL AGREEMENT ON BEHALF OF COUNTY, SUBJECT TO SUCCESSFUL NEGOTIATION OF SUCH AMENDMENT; AND WAIVING REQUIREMENTS OF RESOLUTION NO. R-130-06 [SEE ORIGINAL ITEM UNDER FILE NO. 161550] (Regulatory and Economic Resources)2 reports
   2. RESOLUTION APPROVING GRANT AGREEMENT, AS AMENDED IN THE MANNER SET FORTH IN THIS RESOLUTION, BETWEEN OAK PLAZA ASSOCIATES (DEL.) LLC AND MIAMI-DADE COUNTY RELATING TO GRANT IN AMOUNT OF $2,000,000.00 FROM PROJECT 320 ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT FUND OF BUILDING BETTER COMMUNITIES GENERAL OBLIGATION BOND PROGRAM; AUTHORIZING COUNTY MAYOR OR COUNTY MAYOR’S DESIGNEE TO EXECUTE AND DELIVER AMENDED GRANT AGREEMENT ON BEHALF OF COUNTY SUBJECT TO SUCCESSFUL NEGOTIATION OF SUCH AMENDMENT; AND WAIVING REQUIREMENTS OF RESOLUTION NO. R-130-06 [SEE ORIGINAL ITEM UNDER FILE NO. 161461] (Regulatory and Economic Resources)2 reports
   3. RESOLUTION AMENDING RESOLUTION NO. R-1054-09 TO INCREASE ALLOCATION FROM BUILDING BETTER COMMUNITIES GENERAL OBLIGATION BOND PROGRAM PROJECT NO. 249 – “PRESERVATION OF AFFORDABLE HOUSING UNITS AND EXPANSION OF HOME OWNERSHIP” FROM $1,000,000.00 TO $3,000,000.00 FOR THE SENATOR VILLAS PROJECT LOCATED AT SW 40TH STREET AND SW 89TH AVENUE TO FUND THE DEVELOPMENT OF AFFORDABLE HOUSING UNITS FOR THE ELDERLY IN COMMISSION DISTRICT 102 reports

POLISCOPE has no related bills, finance activity or mapped connections for this entity in the records it has processed. That is a gap in coverage, not a finding about the entity.